| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per discussion, this field isn't really specified in a way that lets
us fill it sensibly at the moment. So for now, we're going to just
omit it.
Additionally, we said that we'd Report on our errors; this branch
changes the implementation of RpcError to do that.
Question: Will the blanket implementation for Into<RpcError> make
it harder to re-add a Data field later on if we want to do so?
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
It is no longer necessary to say, for every RPC method,
that its error type is RpcError.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
We have decided not to remove the "anybody can define methods"
property. This commit documents the consequences, and warns
extenders away from some really bad ideas.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
