| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| ... | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Preparatory work for getting rid of some manual Debug impls
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|/ / / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Speed up RsaIdentity decoding
Closes #377
See merge request tpo/core/arti!381
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
These aren't critical-path, but they do make the code a little nicer.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This commit changes the main parsing code for RsaIdentity in
tor-netdoc, and .
Previously, parse_hex_ident was something like 10% of our startup
CPU time; now it's only like ~2%. (Still not perfect, but way
better.)
Closes #377.
|
| | | |/ / /
| |/| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
We perform this operation in a bunch of places, and most of them
use hex::decode(). That's not great, since hex::decode() has to do
heap allocation. This implementation uses hex::decode_to_slice(),
which should be faster.
(In the future we might choose to use one of the faster hex
implementations, but I'm hoping that this change will be sufficient
to get hex decoding out of our profiles.)
Part of #377.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / /
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
arti-testing: Initial implementation
See merge request tpo/core/arti!378
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
This commit adds a new program to try to implement the ideas behind
experimentation in arti#329. In particular, it tries to implement
basic client "can I bootstrap and connect" functionality testing,
with a lot of instrumentation, and support for breaking things.
So far, the instrumentation is limited to counting TCP bytes and
connections, and counting events. Still, this is enough to measure
behavior on some of the incorrect-clock tests.
NOTE:
For now, you are _required_ to pass in an explicit configuration, in
hopes that this will lead you to override your storage directories
for doing specific experiments.
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Tidy up many open-coded trait impls
See merge request tpo/core/arti!374
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
The Default impl was the only call site for new()
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
This just clones the fields. It is not clear to me why it was
written this way in be86df631dec
Remove anyhow dependency from tor-retry, and rename it to retry-error
Previously, I think, RetryError wasn't Clone.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
When I wrote this, I arranged to skip dumping the field `pending`.
This must have been because I thought that either
(a) PendingEntry couldn't `#[derive(Debug)]` (but it can)
and/or
(b) Some of the fields of PendingEntry ought not to be dumped because
they might contain (eg) packet data. But I think they don't: there's
just the spec, and the Result which is (basically) a Circ.
I tried preseving something closer to the original using educe, but
educe gets somehow tangled up with the generics, and the result fails
to compile. I haven't investigated this further.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
No functional change.
|
| | |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
I'm going to change the code that does this, so add a test first
to check the output doesn't change.
At some point we should have more RSA tests.
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
arti-client: Make dirmgr() and circmgr() return &Arc<..>
Closes #369
See merge request tpo/core/arti!379
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Previously they returned an Arc, which wasn't necessary unless the
client actually _wanted_ a new Arc.
This would be an API break, except that these functions are marked
'experimental-api', so semver does not apply; nonetheless I've noted
the break in semver_status.md, just in case we care.
Closes #369
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / /
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Switch to shellexpand-fork version of shellexpand
See merge request tpo/core/arti!373
|
| | |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Apropos discussion in
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/274
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Alternative DirProvider setup
See merge request tpo/core/arti!347
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Put it behind experimental_api.
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
This patch removes the EventStream associated type and the Runtime
parameter. The Runtime parameter wasn't actually used for anything,
and the EventStream was easy enough to replace with a BoxStream in
this case.
Also replaced DirBootstrapEvents with a BoxStream to avoid tying
anything to our backend.
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Disable clippy::clone_on_ref_ptr
See merge request tpo/core/arti!352
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
This lint is IMO inherently ill-conceived.
I have looked for the reasons why this might be thought to be a good
idea and there were basically two (and they are sort of contradictory):
I. "Calling ‘.clone()` on an Rc, Arc, or Weak can obscure the fact
that only the pointer is being cloned, not the underlying data."
This is the wording from
https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/v0.0.212/#clone_on_ref_ptr
It is a bit terse; we are left to infer why it is a bad idea to
obscure this fact. It seems to me that if it is bad to obscure some
fact, that must be because the fact is a hazard. But why would it be
a hazard to not copy the underlying data ?
In other languages, faliing to copy the underlying data is a serious
correctness hazard. There is a whose class of bugs where things were
not copied, and then mutated and/or reused in multiple places in ways
that were not what the programmer intended. In my experience, this is
a very common bug when writing Python and Javascript. I'm told it's
common in golang too.
But in Rust this bug is much much harder to write. The data inside an
Arc is immutable. To have this bug you'd have use interior mutability
- ie mess around with Mutex or RefCell. That provides a good barrier
to these kind of accidents.
II. "The reason for writing Rc::clone and Arc::clone [is] to make it
clear that only the pointer is being cloned, as opposed to the
underlying data. The former is always fast, while the latter can
be very expensive depending on what is being cloned."
This is the reasoning found here
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/2048
This is saying that *not* using Arc::clone is hazardous.
Specifically, that a deep clone is a performance hazard.
But for this argument, the lint is precisely backwards. It's linting
the "good" case and asking for it to be written in a more explicit
way; while the supposedly bad case can be written conveniently.
Also, many objects (in our codebase, and in all the libraries we use)
that are Clone are in fact simply handles. They contain Arc(s) (or
similar) and are cheap to clone. Indeed, that is the usual case.
It does not make sense to distinguish in the syntax we use to clone
such a handle, whether the handle is a transparent Arc, or an opaque
struct containing one or more other handles.
Forcing Arc::clone to be written as such makes for code churn when a
type is changed from Arc<Something> to Something: Clone, or vice
versa.
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ |
|
| |\| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | |/ / / / /
| |/| | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Conflicts:
crates/arti-hyper/examples/hyper.rs
Trivially resolved. Hyper example still works.
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Implement TLS in arti-hyper
See merge request tpo/core/arti!355
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
As per
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/355#note_2781816
|