| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The lack of this seems to have been an oversight.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will make it much more convenient for code that only wants one of
these traits (or a subset of them). This is a good thing to support
because it will allow us to use a ZST in places that do not need an
actual async runtime handle (typically, the runtime handle is needed
only for spawn).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, Arti doesn't need this. But once it does, it will be
way better to have a separate type for connected sockets, rather
than having to error-check every time somebody gives us a socket.
Part of #410
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The Default impl was the only call site for new()
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now all of the runtime types we provide all
impl<S> TlsProvider<S> where S: ...
rather than merely TlsProvider<Self::TcpStream>.
And we document and intent to perhaps require this in the future.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Nothing actually used these accessor functions, and it's not clear
what would. We can add them later if they're needed.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
These probably aren't for things that will fail IRL, but it's nice
to have coverage on the code, just in case.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This avoids a future confusion with the new `SpawnBlocking` trait in
async_executors v0.5, and better describes what the trait provides.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit puts the native-tls crate behind a feature. The feature
is off-by-default in the tor-rtcompat crate, but can be enabled
either from arti or arti-client.
There is an included script that I used to test that tor-rtcompat
could build and run its tests with all subsets of its features.
Closes #300
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
If we implement our own clone on CompoundRuntime, we no longer need
Clone implementations on our TlsProvider implementations.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Having separate types here doesn't justify the (very limited)
benefit of distinguishing between the case where we have created an
executor that we own and the case where we have a handle to an
already-running tokio executor.
Part of #301.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Also, more comments on why these limitations are safe within the
context of Tor, but you wouldn't want to use them elsewhere.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This change uses the async-native-tls crate for everything, and
deletes some duplicated code.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is based on @janimo's approach in !74, but diverges in a few
important ways.
1. It assumes that something like !251 will merge, so that we can
have separate implementations for native_tls and rustls compiled
at the same time.
2. It assumes that we can implement this for the futures::io traits
only with no real penalty.
3. It uses the `x509-signature` crate to work around the pickiness of
the `webpki` crate. If webpki eventually solves their
[bug 219](https://github.com/briansmith/webpki/issues/219), we
can remove a lot of that workaround.
Closes #86.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This will make it easier to implement them using some other TLS
provider as well, without having to duplicate all of our code.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`tor-rtcompat`'s `TlsConnector` trait previously included a method to
create a TLS-over-TCP connection, which implied creating a TCP stream
inside that method. This commit changes that, and makes the function
wrap a TCP stream, as returned from the runtime's `TcpProvider` trait
implementation, instead.
This means you can actually override `TcpProvider` and have it apply to
*all* connections Arti makes, which is useful for issues like arti#235
and other cases where you want to have a custom TCP stream
implementation.
This required updating the mock TCP/TLS types in `tor-rtmock` slightly;
due to the change in API, we now store whether a `LocalStream` should
actually be a TLS stream inside the stream itself, and check this
property on reads/writes in order to detect misuse. The fake TLS wrapper
checks this property and removes it in order to "wrap" the stream,
making reads and writes work again.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We want to only use TODO in the codebase for non-blockers, and open
tickets for anything that is a bigger blocker than a TODO. These
XXXXs seem like definite non-blockers to me.
Part of arti#231.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
(The nightly version of clippy now includes macros for its
missing_docs_in_private_items lint.)
|
| | |
|
|
|
This will cause some pain for now, but now is really the best time
to do this kind of thing.
|
