| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These have all had backward-compatible changes.
Generated with:
```
cargo set-version --bump patch -p fs-mistrust
cargo set-version --bump patch -p test-temp-dir
cargo set-version --bump patch -p fslock-guard
cargo set-version --bump patch -p hashx
cargo set-version --bump patch -p equix
cargo set-version --bump patch -p caret
cargo set-version --bump patch -p safelog
cargo set-version --bump patch -p retry-error
```
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bump the minor version of these crates, and update the in-tree
dependencies.
Recently published as fresh crates, let's just assume there are
breaking changes:
fslock-guard
test-temp-dir
Breaking API change affecting many many downstream crates:
tor-rtcompat
Downstream crates which we're (conservatively) assuming have
tor-rtcompat types in their APIs:
tor-rtmock
tor-log-ratelim
tor-rpcbase
tor-llcrypto
tor-protover
tor-bytes
tor-hscrypto
tor-hspow
tor-socksproto
tor-checkable
tor-cert
tor-linkspec
tor-cell
tor-proto
tor-netdoc
tor-consdiff
tor-netdir
tor-congestion
tor-persist
tor-chanmgr
tor-ptmgr
tor-guardmgr
tor-circmgr
tor-dirclient
tor-dirmgr
tor-keymgr
tor-hsclient
tor-hsservice
tor-hsrproxy
arti-client
arti-rpcserver
arti-config
arti-hyper
arti-bench
arti-testing
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This includes:
```
tor-basic-utils
caret
fs-mistrust
safelog
retry-error
tor-events
tor-units
tor-geoip
tor-rtcompat
tor-rpcbase
tor-protover
tor-socksproto
tor-checkable
tor-congestion
tor-persist
tor-circmgr
arti-rpcserver
arti-config
arti-hyper
arti-bench
arti-testing
tor-consdiff
```
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These crates have had trivial changes only: typically,
changes to documentation or to clippy warnings. There's no
good reason to update which version of them other crates depend on,
so we only bump _their_ patchlevels.
```
tor-async-utils
caret
safelog
tor-events
tor-units
tor-rtcompat
tor-rpcbase
tor-llcrypto
tor-protover
tor-bytes
tor-hscrypto
tor-socksproto
tor-cert
tor-cell
tor-consdiff
tor-congestion
arti-rpcserver
arti-testing
arti-bench
arti-config
arti-hyper
```
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Closes #950.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These crates have had nonfunctional changes only, mostly due to !1271,
or ac90cb7500f2f108, or documentation changes: crates that depend on
them do not require a version bump.
```
arti-bench
arti-config
arti-hyper
arti-testing
caret
fs-mistrust
retry-error
tor-async-utils
tor-basic-utils
tor-chanmgr
tor-checkable
tor-congestion
tor-consdiff
tor-events
tor-guardmgr
tor-persist
tor-protover
tor-ptmgr
tor-rtcompat
tor-rtmock
tor-units
```
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Generated with the following commands:
```
cargo set-version --bump minor -p tor-cell
cargo set-version --bump minor -p tor-linkspec
cargo set-version --bump minor -p tor-proto
cargo set-version --bump minor -p tor-netdoc
cargo set-version --bump minor -p tor-circmgr
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-cert
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-basic-utils
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-rpcbase
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-llcrypto
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-hscrypto
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-checkable
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-async-utils
cargo set-version --bump patch -p caret
cargo set-version --bump patch -p fs-mistrust
cargo set-version --bump patch -p safelog
cargo set-version --bump patch -p retry-error
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-error
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-config
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-events
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-units
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-rtcompat
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-rtmock
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-protover
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-bytes
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-socksproto
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-consdiff
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-netdir
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-congestion
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-persist
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-chanmgr
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-ptmgr
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-guardmgr
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-dirclient
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-dirmgr
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-hsclient
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-hsservice
cargo set-version --bump patch -p arti-client
cargo set-version --bump patch -p arti-rpcserver
cargo set-version --bump patch -p arti-config
cargo set-version --bump patch -p arti-hyper
cargo set-version --bump patch -p arti
cargo set-version --bump patch -p arti-bench
cargo set-version --bump patch -p arti-testing
```
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This does the following:
- Gives every crate a `full`.
- Cause every `full` to depend on `full` from the lower-level
crates.
- Makes every feature listed _directly_ in `experimental` depend
on `__is_experimental`.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Because of the errorkind bumps, we're calling this a breaking change
in everything lower-level than `arti`.
Generated with:
```
cargo set-version -p tor-basic-utils --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-async-utils --bump minor
cargo set-version -p caret --bump minor
cargo set-version -p fs-mistrust --bump minor
cargo set-version -p safelog --bump minor
cargo set-version -p retry-error --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-error --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-config --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-events --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-units --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-rtcompat --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-rtmock --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-rpcbase --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-llcrypto --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-protover --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-bytes --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-hscrypto --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-socksproto --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-checkable --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-cert --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-linkspec --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-cell --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-proto --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-netdoc --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-consdiff --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-netdir --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-congestion --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-persist --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-chanmgr --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-ptmgr --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-guardmgr --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-circmgr --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-dirclient --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-dirmgr --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-hsclient --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-hsservice --bump minor
cargo set-version -p arti-client --bump minor
cargo set-version -p arti-rpcserver --bump minor
cargo set-version -p arti-config --bump minor
cargo set-version -p arti-hyper --bump minor
cargo set-version -p arti --bump patch
cargo set-version -p arti-bench --bump patch
cargo set-version -p arti-testing --bump patch
```
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These crates had no changes until just a moment ago. But since
we updated the versions on some of their dependents, they have now
changed themselves. Thus they get patchlevel bumps.
```
tor-rtmock
tor-protover
tor-socksproto
tor-consdiff
tor-chanmgr
tor-dirclient
tor-hsservice
```
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For these crates, the changes are nontrivial, so we
_do_ bump the versions on which their dependent crates depend.
Fortunately, since they are all pre-1.0, we don't need to
distinguish semver-additions from other changes. (Except for arti,
which _is_ post-1.0, but gets a patchlevel bump anyway.)
These are unstable crates with breaking changes:
```
tor-hscrypto
tor-hsclient
```
These have new or extended APIs:
```
safelog
tor-bytes
tor-cell
tor-linkspec
tor-llcrypto
tor-proto
tor-cert
arti-client
```
These have new unstable APIs or features:
```
tor-netdoc
tor-circmgr (also broke some unstable APIs)
arti (is post-1.0)
```
These have bugfixes only:
```
caret
tor-dirmgr
```
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
These crates have not had changes to their behavior; as such it is
not necessary to bump their dependencies to require the new versions.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This panics on error, and we're fine with a panic on misbehavior in
tests.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This warning kind of snuck up on us! (See #748) For now, let's
disable it. (I've cleaned it up in a couple of examples, since
those are meant to be more idiomatic and user-facing.)
Closes #748.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This is precisely the result of running the rune in
maint/adhoc-add-lint-blocks.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
We made this job easy this time around: by incrementing our MSRV, we
have forced ourselves to do at least a minor bump everywhere.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently cargo fmt doesn't like these, which my perl rune didn't
delete.
This commit is precisely the result of `cargo fmt`.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The feature we want is `#[doc = include_str!("README.md")]`, which is
stable since 1.54 and our MSRV is now 1.56.
This commit is precisely the result of the following Perl rune:
perl -i~ -0777 -pe 's{(^//!(?!.*\@\@).*\n)+}{#![doc = include_str!("../README.md")]\n}m' crates/*/src/lib.rs
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since our last round of releases, these crates have had either
trivial changes, or changes that did not affect their APIs.
Therefore we are bumping their versions, but not changing which
versions of them other crates depend on.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
"Trivial" here includes stuff like cargo reformatting, comment
edits, error message string changes, and clippy warning changes.
Crates that depend on these do not need to increment.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Update all lint blocks
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
These need to survive.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
From running add_warning, with manual picking of the right
hunks/lines.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This was the result of:
maint/add_warning crates/*/src/{lib,main}.rs
and then manually curating the results.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Utilize cargo-sort: https://github.com/DevinR528/cargo-sort
Signed-off-by: Orhun Parmaksız <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
* Except for safelog and fs-mistrust, which are new.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is an automated change made with a perl one-liner and verified
with grep -L and grep -l.
Some warnings are introduced with this change; they will be removed
in subsequent commits.
See arti#208 for older discussion on this issue.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change was made automatically with a perl one-liner, and
confirmed with `grep -L`.
The `rust-version` field itself was introduced in 1.56.0.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
There are no semantic changes here; only formatting. This is in
preparation for other changes (wrt MSRV and edition)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not all of these strictly need to be bumped to 0.2.0; many could go
to 0.1.1 instead. But since everything at the tor-rtcompat and
higher layers has had breaking API changes, it seems not so useful
to distinguish. (It seems unlikely that anybody at this stage is
depending on e.g. tor-protover but not arti-client.)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This should save around 1MB per consensus, since every relay has a
'protocols' lines, but there are only a few distinct possibilities
for such a line.
Closes #385.
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Disable clippy::clone_on_ref_ptr
See merge request tpo/core/arti!352
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This lint is IMO inherently ill-conceived.
I have looked for the reasons why this might be thought to be a good
idea and there were basically two (and they are sort of contradictory):
I. "Calling ‘.clone()` on an Rc, Arc, or Weak can obscure the fact
that only the pointer is being cloned, not the underlying data."
This is the wording from
https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/v0.0.212/#clone_on_ref_ptr
It is a bit terse; we are left to infer why it is a bad idea to
obscure this fact. It seems to me that if it is bad to obscure some
fact, that must be because the fact is a hazard. But why would it be
a hazard to not copy the underlying data ?
In other languages, faliing to copy the underlying data is a serious
correctness hazard. There is a whose class of bugs where things were
not copied, and then mutated and/or reused in multiple places in ways
that were not what the programmer intended. In my experience, this is
a very common bug when writing Python and Javascript. I'm told it's
common in golang too.
But in Rust this bug is much much harder to write. The data inside an
Arc is immutable. To have this bug you'd have use interior mutability
- ie mess around with Mutex or RefCell. That provides a good barrier
to these kind of accidents.
II. "The reason for writing Rc::clone and Arc::clone [is] to make it
clear that only the pointer is being cloned, as opposed to the
underlying data. The former is always fast, while the latter can
be very expensive depending on what is being cloned."
This is the reasoning found here
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/2048
This is saying that *not* using Arc::clone is hazardous.
Specifically, that a deep clone is a performance hazard.
But for this argument, the lint is precisely backwards. It's linting
the "good" case and asking for it to be written in a more explicit
way; while the supposedly bad case can be written conveniently.
Also, many objects (in our codebase, and in all the libraries we use)
that are Clone are in fact simply handles. They contain Arc(s) (or
similar) and are cheap to clone. Indeed, that is the usual case.
It does not make sense to distinguish in the syntax we use to clone
such a handle, whether the handle is a transparent Arc, or an opaque
struct containing one or more other handles.
Forcing Arc::clone to be written as such makes for code churn when a
type is changed from Arc<Something> to Something: Clone, or vice
versa.
|
| |/ |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Refactor errors in tor-netdoc
See merge request tpo/core/arti!314
|