| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| ... | |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The key insights here are:
- That relay cell format and crypto protocols aren't orthogonal:
Once we have GCO, it will require V1.
- That we only need the actual functions for layer construction to
be generic; we don't need to proliferate generic parameters
everywhere.
- That the circuit::handshake module already does most of what we
want.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This lets us paramaterize types and functions by a particular relay cell
format. We use this e.g. to statically parameterize the cell crypto
functions, thereby removing some run-time branching in the hot path.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Different formats will use different ranges for the `recognized` and
`digest` fields.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prop 340:
https://spec.torproject.org/proposals/340-packed-and-fragmented.html
This updates the decoding API to support multiple versions of the relay
cell encoding, including the new encoding proposed in prop340 that
supports relay message packing and fragmentation.
This commit doesn't actually add support for that new encoding yet.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
For consistency with the terminology proposed in
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/torspec/-/issues/253
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Remove semver.md files from arti 1.2.0 release.
See merge request tpo/core/arti!2022
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
deny clippy::unchecked_duration_subtraction
Closes #1304
See merge request tpo/core/arti!2008
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We bumped the minor version of `tor_checkable`, which is used in the
`tor-cell` public APIs (e.g. `Ed25519Cert` implements
`tor_checkable::Timebound`, using `tor_checkable::TimeValidityError`
as its error type).
This bumps the minor version of `tor-cert` (including for its
dependents).
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
APIs were broken in these pre-1.0.0 crates:
```
tor-keymgr
tor-config
tor-checkable
tor-circmgr
tor-dirmgr
tor-hsclient
tor-hsservice
tor-hsrproxy
```
Done with:
```
cargo set-version --bump minor -p tor-keymgr
cargo set-version --bump minor -p tor-config
cargo set-version --bump minor -p tor-checkable
cargo set-version --bump minor -p tor-circmgr
cargo set-version --bump minor -p tor-dirmgr
cargo set-version --bump minor -p tor-hsclient
cargo set-version --bump minor -p tor-hsservice
cargo set-version --bump minor -p tor-hsrproxy
```
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
APIs were added:
```
tor-units
tor-cell
tor-proto
tor-netdir
arti-client
```
Done with:
```
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-units
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-cell
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-proto
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-netdir
cargo set-version --bump patch -p arti-client
```
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`tor_circmgr::Error::Protocol` will soon include an optional `UniqId`.
Since `Protocol` errors can be caused by pending circuits, we need to be
able to peek at their `UniqId`.
Part of #1297
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some of the `tor_circmgr::Error` variants will include the `UniqId` of the
corresponding circuit, so we'll need to be able to display it without the
`Circ ` prefix.
Part of #1297
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We never actually constructed these before, but now we enforce it at
the API level.
Part of #1269.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bump the minor version of these crates, and update the in-tree
dependencies.
Recently published as fresh crates, let's just assume there are
breaking changes:
fslock-guard
test-temp-dir
Breaking API change affecting many many downstream crates:
tor-rtcompat
Downstream crates which we're (conservatively) assuming have
tor-rtcompat types in their APIs:
tor-rtmock
tor-log-ratelim
tor-rpcbase
tor-llcrypto
tor-protover
tor-bytes
tor-hscrypto
tor-hspow
tor-socksproto
tor-checkable
tor-cert
tor-linkspec
tor-cell
tor-proto
tor-netdoc
tor-consdiff
tor-netdir
tor-congestion
tor-persist
tor-chanmgr
tor-ptmgr
tor-guardmgr
tor-circmgr
tor-dirclient
tor-dirmgr
tor-keymgr
tor-hsclient
tor-hsservice
tor-hsrproxy
arti-client
arti-rpcserver
arti-config
arti-hyper
arti-bench
arti-testing
|
| |
|
|
| |
Discard hunks in examples/
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Several clean-ups around failures in incoming stream request handlers.
Closes #1190, #1189, and #1188
See merge request tpo/core/arti!1892
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Closes #1190
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
In theory, it might be better to just un-register the
IncomingStreamRequestHandler when the Receiver for the stream
requests is dropped. However, there are two reasons not to do so:
1. It's tricky. We never actually poll on the corresponding Sink,
so there isn't a place where the Reactor would expect to get a
prompt notification of closure. We only find out that the
Receiver has been dropped when an attempt to send on the Sink
returns an `is_disconnected` error.
2. It's unnecessary. In the Tor protocols, once we have decided to
accept incoming stream requests on a circuit, we want to continue
to do so until one of the parties closes the circuit.
I've documented this in several comments, in case whe want to get
fancier in the future.
Closes #1188.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Closes #1189.
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
| |
The bug described here was already fixed as #1065 via !1681.
Closes #1191.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These are about making allow_incoming_streams give an error if a
handler is already installed.
I'm calling these non-MUST, since they don't affect the actual API
here, and we already have comments telling you not to do that. We
can add them later.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These comments are about internal representations and future extensions.
Also, add a fail-safe check to make sure that hop_num consistency is
enforced.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These crates had no changes previously, but they depend on crates
that had breaking changes themselves.
tor-linkspec
tor-hspow
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This crate doesn't have a meaningful public API, so it just gets a patchlevel bump:
arti
These crates had nonbreaking changes, and get a patchlevel bump:
tor-rtcompat
fs-mistrust
tor-llcrypto
tor-cert
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These crates have breaking changes on their own:
tor-error
tor-netdoc
tor-dirmgr
tor-keymgr
Because of the breaking change in tor-error, and the fact that
basically every crate publicly depends on tor-error (by implementing
ErrorKind), we need to call this a breaking change on all of the
following:
tor-config
tor-geoip
tor-rtmock
tor-log-ratelim
tor-rpcbase
tor-bytes
tor-hscrypto
tor-socksproto
tor-cell
tor-proto
tor-netdoc
tor-netdir
tor-persist
tor-chanmgr
tor-ptmgr
tor-guardmgr
tor-circmgr
tor-dirclient
tor-dirmgr
tor-keymgr
tor-hsclient
tor-hsservice
tor-hsrproxy
arti-client
arti-rpcserver
arti-config
arti-hyper
arti-testing
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Filed
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/issues/1176
proposing a final fix.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Resolves clippy complaints about needless fallible conversions.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
FTR I don't think agree with clippy on this question, but then I often
don't.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit is pure renaming, done automatically with rust-analyzer.
Comment fixes and other cleanups will be in the subsequent commits.
We're doing this renaming because we need a name for
the combination of a `RelayMsg` and an `Option<StreamId>`
that we use when we have a `RelayMsg`
we intend to route to a given stream or circuit internally.
Previously we called this a `RelayCell`,
but that name was already somewhat inaccurate,
and will become _very_ inaccurate with the arrival of prop340,
which breaksthe 1:1 relationship between relay cells
and relay messages.
(If we didn't do this renaming now, we'd soon be making
the relationship between `UnparsedRelayCell`and `RelayCell`
many-to-many, which would be ridiculous and confusing.)
The `RelayMsgOuter` name is a placeholder:
We expect that we'll want to rename this type,
and may also want to rename `RelayMsg`,
and unify our vocabulary in other areas too.
But such a renaming will have to wait
for a larger discussion affecting the specifications,
so that we can use the same vocabulary everywhere.
|