| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| ... | |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The responder always sends an AUTH_CHALLENGE cell.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As far as I know, a responder will always send an AUTH_CHALLENGE cell
since it doesn't yet know if the initiator is a client or relay. The
spec also doesn't have any mention about the AUTH_CHALLENGE being
optional. So we should send it in our tests as well.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Rename them to respectively sensitive() and not_sensitive().
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is used when we build an OwnedChanTarget using the builder. Instead
of going identities by identities at the callsite, we can use this
helper to get us a RelayIds builder and set it in the
OwnedChanTargetBuilder.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To make the code a bit better here. Also, at this commit, the
UnverifiedChannel::finish() and VerifiedChannel::finish() are basically
the exact same.
A refactoring to use a finish() helper would work nicely.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Every specific types know if the peer is sensitive or not so now the
finish() of each of these channel types builds the right PeerInfo with
MaybeSensitive.
This is passed on the Channel so from that point on, the Channel will
never leak peer data in the logs.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
And implement Display as well. This is for the upcoming changes to be
able to wrap PeerInfo into a MaybeSensitive<> container which can be
logged safely hence the Display.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This required to implement Display for PtTarget.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Only the R2R channel that the PeerAddr becomes unsensitive. The rest, we
keep it sensitive as it can be a client or a client's guard/bridge.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
relay: Couple fixes related to channel creation
See merge request tpo/core/arti!3726
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before this commit, we would use the RsaIdentity which is a SHA1 digest.
We do the same for the peer RSA key.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It was all commented out until now that we have a final
RelayIdentities.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes #1601
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
```text
Completed handshake with Ed25519Identity { ClByyE4zT+p3dudeCVkUfVA1zp2y2sOUe7u/HHLliWU } [(RsaIdentity { $547bb37f9cd8079eaf1cfcb73fff5887d6f58138 }, [9, 111, 131, 62, 212, 144, 149, 88, 211, 87, 175, 114, 18, 111, 189, 36, 205, 21, 66, 205, 217, 176, 139, 130, 70, 211, 40, 130, 79, 29, 144, 179])]
```
After:
```text
Completed handshake with ed25519:wo9NA5RXkPAc7sB2301JBpvdk1RvSOGZEzgwuWP/msA [$feebaba2b6faf53ae1dc8dda8681ce026537dfa4]
```
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
These were previously in a single `Option`, but now that the `Option`
was removed, I think it's nicer to make these separate fields.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
I don't think that the `Option`s are needed anymore, since
unauthenticated channels no longer transition through the
`VerifiedChannel` state.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The validate_relay_target() is meant to probably have more checks in the
future hence the vagueness of it instead of being specific to the goal
of this patch.
Closes #1699
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit also adds the TlsKeyAndCert to the identities so the TLS
acceptor can set it up.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Responder relay handshake requires the peer address at the very start as
it sends its NETINFO right away.
For initiators, we only need it during the finalization process which is
when the NETINFO is sent and the Channel is created.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a large change but it is basically using PeerAddr in the channel
builder through the channel handshake code and into the Channel itself.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The plan is to create PeerInfo when we do a transport connect() which
indicates the exact values that are being used for to connect to the
peer.
We'll then put this struct in the Channel so we can use it when picking
the best channel in the ChanMgr.
Unfortunately, the OwnedChanTarget has a confusing and even possibly
wrong API from which we can't have guarantees.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
proto: Replace circuit-scoped `CircSyncView` with per-hop alternative
Closes #2351
See merge request tpo/core/arti!3680
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The `CircHopSyncView` is now the view of a hop, not of the whole
circuit.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
And update the docs
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Now that CircSyncView no longer needs to know the total number of
streams, we can use it in the new per-hop stream reactor design.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
`IncomingStreamRequestFilter`s, and `CircSyncView`s, by extension, are used
both by old relay implementation and the new one for implementing an
out-of-reactor way of deciding how to handle an incoming stream.
In the new circuit reactor design, we have a separate stream reactor for
each hop. Upon receiving an incoming stream, the stream reactor will
need to build one of these `CircSyncView` objects, and then pass it to
an externally-provided `IncomingStreamRequestFilter`. Before this
change, `CircSyncView::n_open_streams()` returned the total number of
open streams, which wouldn't have worked with the new reactor design,
because the per-hop stream reactor doesn't have a global view of all the
hops, so its `CircSyncView` can't return the total number of streams (at
least not without message passing, or sharing state with the other
stream reactors).
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Note: this commit only contains the removal of the old `CircSyncView`,
and it of course doens't compile. A future commit will replace the
removed file with the `syncview.rs` from the client module.
This change is split over two commits because it makes reviewing easier
(`git mv`ing the new file over the old results in a confusing diff,
because `git` refuses to show it as a move).
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is in preparation for replacing the top-level `CircSyncView` with
it.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
This file will be moved to the top-level `circuit` module soon.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This will soon replace `CircSyncView` wholesale. The preliminary
renaming will make the future diffs easier to review.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
This will soon be needed for building a `CircSyncView`.
|
| |\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| | |
Bump MSRV to 1.89
See merge request tpo/core/arti!3684
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
`clippy::collapsible_if` started triggering after bumping the MSRV to
1.88.
Since this triggers from a lot of places, and since there even are a
couple of instances where we explicitly allow `clippy::collapsible_ifs`,
I've opened #2342 for deciding what to do about it.
|
| |\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| | |
relay: Pass our TLS cert to the responder verify process
See merge request tpo/core/arti!3665
|