| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With a protocol violation, we have to immediately deal with such event
before emitting anything on the wire.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This mirrors also the relay reactor. We've introduced the ProtoViolation
into a previous commit which is not an action but rather an "event" that
happened on a circuit.
And so, better semantic. No behavior change.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Because of https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/torspec/-/issues/385
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Same as the client reactor, a message outside of our restricted set
leads to a reactor shutdown.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Move the client specific unit tests into the client module.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit removes the CircuitRx* based solely on the client circuit
message and moves it into the top level of the crate so all reactors can
use them.
The client reactor then upon receiving the message, it converts the
AnyChanMsg into a ClientCircChanMsg. On error, this leads to a shutdown
of the entire reactor due to a fatal error.
In order to pull this off, we added a CircuitAction::Shutdown that is
handled as a priority.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This follows the move of the client specific object.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Next commit will also move the Relay specific set into the relay module.
These two sets are becoming specific to the reactor as the circuit
reactor communication channel will use AnyChanMsg instead.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
proto: Fix relay/hs-service feature gating
See merge request tpo/core/arti!3534
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
We now have add_ent_with_id(), so we can just remove the TODO.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Without this, `tor-proto` doesn't compile if you enable the `relay`
feature but not `hs-service`.
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes part of #2193.
(Edits from nickm: I selected the cases here that I could verify
were correct from immediate context.)
Edited-by: Nick Mathewson <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
proto: Start handling incoming streams in the relay reactor
See merge request tpo/core/arti!3487
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This was all wrong, as mentioned in
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/3487#note_3296033
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Since EXTEND is not used anymore, it's fine to handle it in our
catch-all branch for unrecognized/unsupported cells.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This TODO was copied over from the client reactor, but it doesn't make
any sense here (we don't yet handle control messages in the backward
reactor).
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
While we still re-export StreamReceiver from the client module, I want
to avoid importing it from there in the implementation-agnostic modules,
just to make it clearer we're not using client-specific types.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Initially I wanted to turn `msg_streamid()` into a method on
`UnparsedRelayMsg`, but I ultimately decided against it, because it
feels like it doesn't belong there (even though intuitively, I would've
expected it to handle the mismatch between stream ID and cell command
internally). This is because all the `UnparsedRelayMsg` methods return
`tor_bytes::Result`, and do not actually do any validation beyond some
length checks on the various fields.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
All this indirection is making me dizzy.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The relay reactor is now able to handle incoming stream requests (i.e.
cells that open streams). It currently only supports DATA stream
requests (BEGIN); support for other stream types (BEGIN_DIR, RESOLVE)
will be added later.
`Reactor::new()` now returns the futures::Stream of Tor streams, alongside
the `Reactor` and `RelayCirc` handle. Whoever calls `Reactor::new()` is
responsible for passing the stream of streams over to the task that is
meant to handle it ("handle" in this case means either rejecting the
stream with a given `END` cell, or accepting it and forwarding the
connection between it and the corresponding application stream).
IMPORTANT: the above is a bit half-baked! Next on my TODO list is is to
iron out the details of how/where this will actually be handled.
I am also a bit unsure about the API here: I think it might've been
nicer to give the user the ability to obtain this `futures::Stream` from
`RelayCirc`, which is, after all, a handle to the reactor?
Also on my short-term TODO list is to figure out how conflux will affect
this API and usage.
And there is another wrinkle here: for incoming DATA stream requests,
the handler will need to produce a resulting `DataStream`, which is not
yet fully implementation-agnostic (it wraps a `ClientDataStreamCtrl`).
This too will be handled in a separate MR.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
These will need to be handled soon
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is needed because we will soon have another callsite for it, which
will need to pass `AnyRelayMsgOuter`.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is needed because we want to reuse `StreamTarget` and `DataStream`
on the relay side too, but to do that, we need to abstract away the
tunnel/circuit type (prior to this MR, `StreamTarget` was was
client-specific, as it used to wrap a client tunnel).
Note that `StreamTarget` needs a handle to the client/relay circuit
reactor because it needs to be able to shut down the circuit if a
protocol error occurs (cells carrying stream data are parsed late,
*outside* of the reactor, so if e.g. a cell fails to parse, the
`DataReaderImpl` needs to be able to shut it down), and because it needs
to be able to inform the reactor of flow control-related events (such as
drain rate update).
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
For relays, the hop of the StreamTarget will be set to `None`.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I've made `run()` more similar to its client circuit reactor counterpart
(I think the error reporting will be better, and if we ever need to make
the reactor public, it will be easier this way because now `run()`
doesn't expose the crate-private `ReactorError` type).
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is already namespaced under the `relay` module so the `Relay`
prefix is redundant.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
This will be needed soon.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
We are about to use `StreamReqInfo` for exit streams too.
|