| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit addresses multiple problems highlighted by arti#182:
- `arti-client` had some types in its public API that weren't accessible
without importing another crate (`CfgPath`, `DataReader`,
`DataWriter`). This has been fixed.
- In addition, the doc comments for `DataReader` and `DataWriter` were
cleaned up to be of better quality, now that they're public.
- It was impossible to use `arti-client` without also importing
`tor-rtcompat`. This is now fixed by the addition of two convenience
methods: `TorClient::bootstrap_with_tokio` and
`TorClient::bootstrap_with_async_std`.
- Potentially controversially: `tor-rtcompat` now returns *concrete*
types from methods like `current_runtime`, instead of `impl Runtime`.
- This was needed in order to actually be able to name the `TorClient`
type that results from using these methods.
- This does mean we lose API flexibility, but on balance I think this
is a good thing, because the API we *do* have is actually usable...
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This was an XXXX before. Now it explains why the behavior is safe for
now, but maybe not forever.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, the reactor would use an `UnboundedSender` to send things to
the `RawCellStream`, in order that the reactor wouldn't block if you
failed to read from the latter. This is bad, though, since it means
people can just run us out of memory by sending lots of things.
To fix this, we make the new `StreamReader` type (which does the reading
parts from `RawCellStream`) keep track of the stream's receive window
and issue SENDMEs once *it* has consumed enough data to require it, thus
meaning that we shouldn't get sent enough data to fill the channel
between reactor and `StreamReader` (and, if we do, that's someone trying
to flood us, and we abort the circuit).
As hinted to above, the `RawCellStream` was removed and its reading
functionalities replaced by `StreamReader`; its writing functionalities
are handled by `StreamTarget` anyway, so we just give out one of those
for the write end. This now means we don't need any mutexes!
note: this commit introduces a known issue, arti#230
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rather like e8e9699c3c239d6c30f9ad414f15d3bad6ec03fd ("Get rid of
tor-proto's ChannelImpl, and use the reactor more instead"), this
admittedly rather large commit refactors the way circuits in `tor-proto`
work, centralising all of the logic in one large nonblocking reactor
which other things send messages into and out of, instead of having a
bunch of `-Impl` types that are protected by mutexes.
Congestion control becomes a lot simpler with this refactor, since the
reactor can manage both stream- and circuit-level congestion control
unilaterally without having to share this information with consumers,
meaning we can get rid of some locks.
The way streams work also changes, in order to facilitate better
handling of backpressure / fairness between streams: each stream now has
a set of channels to send and receive messages over, instead of sending
relay cells directly onto the channel (now, the reactor pulls messages
off each stream in each map, and tries to avoid doing so if it won't be
able to forward them yet).
Additionally, a lot of "close this circuit / stream" messages aren't
required any more, since that state is simply indicated by one end of a
channel going away. This should make cleanup a lot less brittle.
Getting all of this to work involved writing a fair deal of intricate
nonblocking code in Reactor::run_once that tries very hard to be mindful
of making backpressure work correctly (and congestion control); the old
code could get away with having tasks .await on things, but the new
reactor can't really do this (as it'd lock the reactor up), so has to do
everything in a nonblocking manner.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
It seems like a good time to do this, before we add a zillion other
arguments to begin_stream.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Make it crate-visible only.
* Make it idempotent
* Have it be an internal error if it's called at the wrong time.
* Simplify the return logic.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Most of the structs in `arti-client` have example code now, to give a
clearer idea of how they're used.
Annoyingly, a lot of the types exposed in `arti-client` are actually
re-exports, which makes documentation a bit harder: example code that
references other parts of `arti-client` can't actually be run as a
doctest, since the crate it's in is a dependency of `arti-client`.
We might be able to fix this in future by doing the documentation in
`arti-client` itself, but rustdoc seems to have some weird behaviours
there that need to be investigated first (for example, it seems to merge
the re-export and original documentation, and also put the re-export
documentation on the `impl` block for some reason).
For now, though, this commit just writes the docs from the point of view
of an `arti-client` consumer, removing notes specific to the crate in
which they're defined. It's not ideal, but at least the end user
experience is decent.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will let callers use the tokio traits on these types too, if
they call `split()` on the DataStream.
(Tokio also has a `tokio::io::split()` method, but it requires a
lock whereas `DataStream::split()` doesn't.)
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
futures::io::AsyncRead (and Write) isn't the same thing as tokio::io::AsyncRead,
which is a somewhat annoying misfeature of the Rust async ecosystem (!).
To mitigate this somewhat for people trying to use the `DataStream` struct with
tokio, implement the tokio versions of the above traits using `tokio-util`'s
compat layer, if a crate feature (`tokio`) is enabled.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Suggested by @cheako.
|
| | |
|
|
|
This will cause some pain for now, but now is really the best time
to do this kind of thing.
|
