| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
| |
This allow us to make a working cross-reference.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
As per
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/657#note_2826169
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As per
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/657#note_2826167
This makes some lines too long; I will run rustfmt in a separate
commit for clarity.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As per
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/657#note_2826151
This gets rid of quite some Bug error paths.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Replace Channel::note_usage with Channel::engage_padding_activities,
which unconditionally causes the channel to (start to) do netflow
padding things.
The condition now lives in chanmgr.
Addresses
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/657#note_2826094
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
To test the padding control we will want this.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Now it's not just cfg(test), but feature testing.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
We are going to want this for through-the-layers padding control
testing.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is actually a general facility for inserting locally-generated
cells into the outgoing stream.
It doesn't seem to be possible to do this without adding an additional
condition check to the reactor, since we need to insert it into the
right place in the stream, giving it priority over data, and only
using it up if there was room in the output.
We don't engage this machinery yet, because nothing sets
special_outgoing.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
We introduce the per-channel state that is used to keep track of
channel usage, and defer padding setup until it's wanted.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Right now this is just furniture. We're going to put channel padding
control state here.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Channel padding depends on what the channel is being used for. We
therefore need to let the channel code know this information.
The implementation of the per-channel padding control logic will be in
the new note_usage function, which for now is simply a stub.
A future commit will introduce a `PaddingControlState` which lives in
the channel frontend; consult the doc comment for that type to see why
the plumbing through the channel manager terminates in the channel
frontend.
|
| |
|
|
| |
This is going to be able to fail in other ways too, sadly.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Replaces 4 open-coded call sites.
I am going to add one more.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This had to become a new internal function, since at the point that
the handshake needs this code, it does not yet have a Channel to use.
This change made the error messages in the handshake code more
informative: and now they require a regex to check. Later, we might
want to defer formatting these strings, but I don't think we need
to do it now.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this change, each individual identity type becomes optional.
The functions that expose them unconditionally are now in a "legacy"
trait that only some downstream types are expected to implement.
There are new convenience APIs in HasRelayIds:
* to return Option<&keytype>,
* to see if one identity-set contains another.
This commit will break several downstream crates! For the
reviewer's convenience, I will put the fixes for those crates into a
series of squash! commits on this one.
tor-netdir
----------
Revise tor-netdir to accept optional identities. This required some
caveats and workarounds about the cases where we have to deal with a
key type that the tor-netdir code does not currently recognize at
all. If we start to add more identity types in the future, we may
well want more internal indices in this code.
tor-proto
---------
In order to make tor-proto support optional identities, there were
fewer changes than I thought. Some "check" functions needed to start
looking at "all the ids we want" rather than at "the two known IDs";
they also needed to accommodate that case where we don't have an ID
that we demand.
This change will also help with bridges, since we want to be able to
connect to a bridge without knowing all of its IDs up front.
The protocol currently _requires_ the two current ID types in some
places. To deal with that, I added a new `MissingId` error.
I also removed a couple of unconditional identity accessors for
chanmgr; code should use `target().identity(...)` instead.
tor-chanmgr
-----------
This is an incomplete conversion: it does not at all handle channel
targets without Ed25519 identities yet. It still uses those
identities to index its internal map from identity to channel; but
it gives a new `MissingId` error type if it's given a channel target
that doesn't have one.
We'll want to revise the map type again down the road when we
implement bridges, but I'd rather not step on the channel-padding
work in progress right now.
tor-guardmgr
------------
This change is mostly a matter of constructing owned identity types
more sensibly, rather than unwrapping them directly.
There are some places marked with TODOs where we still depend on
particular identity types, because of how the directory protocol
works. This will need revisiting when we add bridge support here.
tor-circmgr
-----------
These changes are just relatively simple API changes in the tests.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We want the set of identities supported by a relay to be extensible
in the future with minimal fuss; we'd also like to make working
with these ID sets more convenient. To handle that, this commit
adds a new trait for "Something that has the same IDs as a relay"
and a new object for "an owned representation of a relay's IDs."
This commit introduces a similar trait for "Something with a list of
SocketAddr, like a relay has." There's no owned equivelent for
that, since Vec<SocketAddr> is already a thing.
Closes #428.
|
| |
|
|
| |
These predate OwnedChanTarget, and are no longer needed.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Do not include error source() in display() format.
See merge request tpo/core/arti!598
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
According to doc/Errors.md, and in keeping with current best
practices, we should not include display an error's `source()` as
part of that error's display method. Instead, we should let the
caller decide to call source() and display that error in turn.
Part of #323.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Consequential ordering changes.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
As per
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/586#note_2814276
Change names and comments and docs everywhere.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Addresses
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/586#note_2813567
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Nothing geenrates config updates yet.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
It turns out that we are going to want this.
|
| |/
|
|
| |
chanmgr is going to want to make one of these from a NetDir.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The channel reactor is going to want to be able to sleep so that it
can do padding, so it needs a SleepProvider.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of a channel.
At first I wanted to have this information not be a part of channels
at all, but it is a fairly tiny amount of data, and the alternatives
are pretty crufty.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Each channel now remembers an OwnedChanTarget.
Each circuit now remembers a vector of OwnedChanTarget to represent
the path that it was constructed for.
Part of #415.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Additionally, refactor the IoError out of tor_cell::Error:
nothing in TorCell created this; it was only used by tor_proto.
This required refactoring in tor_proto to use a new error type. Here I
decided to use a new CodecError for now, though we may refactor that
away soon too.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Closes #222.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rather like e8e9699c3c239d6c30f9ad414f15d3bad6ec03fd ("Get rid of
tor-proto's ChannelImpl, and use the reactor more instead"), this
admittedly rather large commit refactors the way circuits in `tor-proto`
work, centralising all of the logic in one large nonblocking reactor
which other things send messages into and out of, instead of having a
bunch of `-Impl` types that are protected by mutexes.
Congestion control becomes a lot simpler with this refactor, since the
reactor can manage both stream- and circuit-level congestion control
unilaterally without having to share this information with consumers,
meaning we can get rid of some locks.
The way streams work also changes, in order to facilitate better
handling of backpressure / fairness between streams: each stream now has
a set of channels to send and receive messages over, instead of sending
relay cells directly onto the channel (now, the reactor pulls messages
off each stream in each map, and tries to avoid doing so if it won't be
able to forward them yet).
Additionally, a lot of "close this circuit / stream" messages aren't
required any more, since that state is simply indicated by one end of a
channel going away. This should make cleanup a lot less brittle.
Getting all of this to work involved writing a fair deal of intricate
nonblocking code in Reactor::run_once that tries very hard to be mindful
of making backpressure work correctly (and congestion control); the old
code could get away with having tasks .await on things, but the new
reactor can't really do this (as it'd lock the reactor up), so has to do
everything in a nonblocking manner.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
@nickm pointed out that refactoring tor_proto::channel's Reactor to do
sending as well meant that it could only send or receive, but not both,
simultaneously, which was bad!
To fix this, rewrite Reactor::run_once to use a handcrafted future (with
futures::future::poll_fn) that can handle the logic required to push
items onto the sink asynchronously (i.e. checking that it can be written
to before trying to do that, and then flushing it).
This also means we don't use select_biased! any more, and just handroll
that logic ourselves; as a small bonus, we can now process all 3 kinds
of message in one run_once() call, instead of having to do only one of
them.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of awkwardly sharing the internals of a `tor-proto` `Channel`
between the reactor task and any other tasks, move most of the internals
into the reactor and have other tasks communicate with the reactor via
message-passing to allocate circuits and send cells.
This makes a lot of things simple, and has convenient properties like
not needing to wrap the `Channel` in an `Arc` (though some places in the
code still do this for now).
A lot of test code required tweaking in order to deal with the refactor;
in fact, fixing the tests probably took longer than writing the mainline
code (!). Importantly, we now use `tokio`'s `tokio::test` annotation
instead of `async_test`, so that we can run things in the background
(which is required to have reactors running for the circuit tests).
This is an instance of #205, and also kind of #217.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There wasn't any good reason for tor-proto's channel reactor to use a
shedload of oneshot channels instead of just an mpsc UnboundedSender,
and the whole `CtrlResult` thing made even less sense.
Straighten this code out by replacing all of that machinery with a
simple UnboundedSender, instead.
(part of arti#218)
|
| | |
|