| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This is going to be its own trait and it is usually best if macros are
named after traits, rather than having the macro derive a different
trait depending on meta attributes.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
We're going to want this for cases where the hash computation
machinery didn't DTRT.
|
| |
|
|
| |
We're going to want this for sets of netdoc signature hashes.
|
| |
|
|
| |
For reuse when we split up the NetdocParseable derive.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
But, all signatures in the current protocol are irregular :-/.
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
tor-dirclient: Support for extra-info requests
See merge request tpo/core/arti!3764
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Accidentally left out in the previous commit.
|
| |/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This commit adds a TODO to implement a trait combining the common fields
in a network status documents.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
tor-netdoc parse2: Rename *Signed to *Unverified
See merge request tpo/core/arti!3742
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This was a weird name, and while working in this area it all seemed to
make the docs strange.
Rename it. This is quite invasive!
In theory we could have the macros generate compatibility aliases, but
that seems quite complex.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I keep not finding it because all the other signatures stuff is in
signatures.rs.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This test case constructs a "netdoc" which consists of one
dir-key-certification item, and parses it using `AuthCertSignatures as
NetdocParseable`. But we're going to split out the parsing trait for
signatures sections, so that's not going to work any more.
This test tests only corner cases of the derived
SignatureItemParseable implementation; but that's unit tested in the
parse2 tests. (Once upon a time there was perhaps manual parsing code
which needed a specific test.)
Remove it.
|
| |/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Done using:
```
for crate in $(./maint/list_crates | rg '^(tor|arti-)'); do
cargo set-version -p $crate 0.40.0
done
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`clippy::collapsible_if` started triggering after bumping the MSRV to
1.88.
Since this triggers from a lot of places, and since there even are a
couple of instances where we explicitly allow `clippy::collapsible_ifs`,
I've opened #2342 for deciding what to do about it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As agreed at our last team meeting.
See
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/#minimum-supported-rust-version
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This enables us to un-ignore RUSTSEC-2026-0009.
See #2341 for analysis of impact.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Done via:
```
for crate in $(./maint/list-crates | rg '^(tor|arti-)'); do
cargo set-version -p $crate 0.39.0
done
```
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
fix(minver): Update paste dependency to be minver compatible
See merge request tpo/core/arti!3610
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
| |
This adds the lint to all our crates.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit replaces the last remaining uses of `EP::Other` in
`tor-netdoc`, which got removed in arti!3561 but was still made use of
in arti!3592 without causing a merge conflict.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Implement EncodedAuthCert and use it in poc for votes
See merge request tpo/core/arti!3592
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The feature arrangements in tor-netdoc are getting to be in need of a
serious overhaul.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
This probably isn't going to happen, but let's keep the idea in-tree.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Move the information which still seems relevant out of the plan
document.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
As per doc/dev/notes/authcert-in-consensus.md.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The string so far is exposed already via whole_for_signatures.
It is unusual for a doc parser to need this, but embedded documents
can use this plus byte_position to get the original input text for
their part of the outer document.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Roughly as per the proposal in `doc/dev/notes/authcert-in-consensus.md`.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We can use the real AuthCert now that it implements the parse2 traits.
The verification function is still used by poc's netstatus code and by
a test case.
We must change the field names in a few places, because the real
AuthCert's struct field names are the keywords, whereas the poc's are
the key names. (A shame that they're different!)
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Use accessors for the body.
(Eventually this function will replace, be replaced by, or merge with,
the existing signature code outside poc.)
|