| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This replaces the hs-pow, hs-pow-full, hs-pow-v1, pow-v1, and pow-full
features with a single hs-pow-full feature.
It's possible that in the future we will want to split different schemes
into different features, but we can do that when it comes up.
For now, having this as a single flag makes it clearer what's going on,
since the previous thing was not actually expressive enough to capture
some things we care about (like "at least one pow scheme is enabled"
that works in a future-compatible way).
This change is not semver breaking since it's a experimental feature.
Related: #1751
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
We need to add the experimental feature, and the corresponding
section in the README.md.
|
| |
|
|
| |
This makes space to introduce the experimental section.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
My previous strategy here was to try and centralize hspow in one crate,
writing it like a self-contained feature. That introduced friction in
the data types, prompting the use of simplistic types at the netdoc/cell
layers and full-featured types in the optional modules.
This changes tactics, dissolving the low-level parts of tor-hspow into
tor-hscrypto and the high-level parts into hsclient/hsservice. Full
featured types are used everywhere now, but the tradeoff is that
compile-time configurability is a lot more pervasive. Anything that
knows about PoW types at all needs to be fully configured out. I took
this opportunity to try a more complete set of crate features, allowing
users to configure individual PoW schemes.
Co-authored-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|
|
This module has types and operations needed in multiple places
for an onion service implementation. There are a bunch of
TODO hs-crypto comments that we'll need to fill in.
|
