| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not all of these strictly need to be bumped to 0.2.0; many could go
to 0.1.1 instead. But since everything at the tor-rtcompat and
higher layers has had breaking API changes, it seems not so useful
to distinguish. (It seems unlikely that anybody at this stage is
depending on e.g. tor-protover but not arti-client.)
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This has the different syntax for builder field attributes than what I
originally proposed in my MR, and which therefore is in the pinned
branch.
My upstream MR for the field attributes feature was morged:
https://github.com/colin-kiegel/rust-derive-builder/issues/239
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This has the humantime_serde::option module, which we have upstreamed
and are about to switch to.
The remaining dependency with version = "1" is going to be removed
in a moment.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We are going to want to specify custom attributes on fields of the
builder struct. This feature was missing from derive_builder.
This commitid is the current head of my MR branch
https://github.com/colin-kiegel/rust-derive-builder/pull/237
https://github.com/ijackson/rust-derive-builder/tree/builder-field-attrs
Using the commitid prevents surprises if that branch is updated.
We will require this newer version of derive_builder. The version
will need to be bumped again later, assuming the upstream MR is merged
and upstream do a release containing the needed changes.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Code motion and the minimal mechanical changes.
As per
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/375#note_2783078
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously coarsetime and the traffic-timestamp feature were
enabled, since they were only required for a small corner of the
guardmgr algorithm.
But in 1.0 and beyond we'll be adding a bunch of other features (eg,
netflow padding, DoS prevention) that will need coarsetime all over
the place.
And since we're going to be doing coarsetime all over the place, the
previous justification for making traffic-timestamping optional (the
tiny performance hit) is no longer relevant.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This needs two kinds. We have decided to treat a non-shutdown
SpawnError as "unexplained" rather than as an InternalError.
There are many crates whose
From<futures::task::SpawnError> for Error
erroneously treat it as an internal error. We will fix them in a moment.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Earlier versions have a bug in UnboundedReceiver that make our new
dirclient tests fail.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
tor-netdir needs to bump because tor-netdoc bumped, even though
there were no other changes in tor-netdir. Whoops.
tor-guardmgr needs to bump because it already published, with the
older tor-netdir.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit puts the native-tls crate behind a feature. The feature
is off-by-default in the tor-rtcompat crate, but can be enabled
either from arti or arti-client.
There is an included script that I used to test that tor-rtcompat
could build and run its tests with all subsets of its features.
Closes #300
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This test should only fail very rarely (around 1/2.4e8) when guards
are chosen from a list of 20 with uniform probability. But that
wasn't what we were doing on the mock test network: we were choosing
from a list of 10 viable guards, with nonuniform probability.
As a fix, we change the test network probabilities so that the
guards _are_ chosen with a uniform probability for this test, and we
use a modified version of the test network where there are indeed 20
Guard-flagged relays with the required DirCache=2 protocol.
Closes #276.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I found these versions empirically, by using the following process:
First, I used `cargo tree --depth 1 --kind all` to get a list of
every immediate dependency we had.
Then, I used `cargo upgrade --workspace package@version` to change
each dependency to the earliest version with which (in theory) the
current version is semver-compatible. IOW, if the current version
was 3.2.3, I picked "3". If the current version was 0.12.8, I
picked "0.12".
Then, I used `cargo +nightly upgrade -Z minimal-versions` to
downgrade Cargo.lock to the minimal listed version for each
dependency. (I had to override a few packages; see .gitlab-ci.yml
for details).
Finally, I repeatedly increased the version of each of our
dependencies until our code compiled and the tests passed. Here's
what I found that we need:
anyhow >= 1.0.5: Earlier versions break our hyper example.
async-broadcast >= 0.3.2: Earlier versions fail our tests.
async-compression 0.3.5: Earlier versions handled futures and tokio
differently.
async-trait >= 0.1.2: Earlier versions are too buggy to compile our
code.
clap 2.33.0: For Arg::default_value_os().
coarsetime >= 0.1.20: exposed as_ticks() function.
curve25519-dalek >= 3.2: For is_identity().
generic-array 0.14.3: Earlier versions don't implement
From<&[T; 32]>
httparse >= 1.2: Earlier versions didn't implement Error.
itertools at 0.10.1: For at_most_once.
rusqlite >= 0.26.3: for backward compatibility with older rustc.
serde 1.0.103: Older versions break our code.
serde_json >= 1.0.50: Since we need its Value type to implement Eq.
shellexpand >= 2.1: To avoid a broken dirs crate version.
tokio >= 1.4: For Handle::block_on().
tracing >= 0.1.18: Previously, tracing_core and tracing had separate
LevelFilter types.
typenum >= 1.12: Compatibility with rust-crypto crates
x25519-dalek >= 1.2.0: For was_contributory().
Closes #275.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To do this at all neatly, I had to split out `tor-config` from
`arti-config` again, and putting the lower level stuff (paths,
builder errors) into tor-config. I also changed our use of
derive_builder to always use a common error type, to avoid
error type proliferation.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We define "coming back online" as happening when a guard attempt
succeeds, if that attempt that was launched when we seemed to be
offline.
We define "seeming to be offline" as having all of our primary
guards marked unreachable, and having received no incoming network
traffic in a while.
Closes #216.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also, refactor our message handling to be more like the tor_proto
reactors. The previous code had a bug where, once the stream of
events was exhausted, we wouldn't actually get any more
notifications.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|
|
There are some missing parts here (like persistence and tests)
and some incorrect parts (I am 90% sure that the "exploratory
circuit" flag is bogus). Also it is not integrated with the circuit
manager code.
|
