| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| ... | |
| |
|
|
| |
The list accessor macro is going to want this.
|
| |
|
|
| |
This matches Cargo.lock. I suspect a mismerge in arti!478.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Use MessagePack.
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
And provide round-trip tests.
As per https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/issues/371
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Document that this can contain either a string for expansion, or a
literal PathBuf not for expansion.
Rename the `from_path` method to `new_literal`: a very important
difference is whether it gets expanded - less important than the Rust
type. Also, now it takes `Into<PathBuf>`, which avoids a needless
clone.
(We don't change the API in `arti-client` because
`&tempfile::Tempdir()` doesn't implement `Into<PathBuf>`, so
`arti-client` has to have some new `as_ref` calls.)
Provide accessors `as_unexpanded_str` and `as_literal_path`. The
deserialisation already makes this part of the stable API,l so not
pvoding accessors seems just obstructive. They are useful for tests,
too.
Add tests for the new entrypoints, and for deserialisation of both
variants from TOML (via config, or directly) and JSON.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We introduce LiteralPath struct, so that a literal path deserialises
from
some_path = { literal: "actual path string" }
This makes the deserialisation unambiguous.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The `[patch]` approach causes the tree not to build when used as a
dependency, unless the `[patch]` is replicated into the depending
project.
Instead, replace our `derive_builer =` dependencies with a reference
to a specific git commit:
perl -i~ -pe 'next unless m/^derive_builder/; s#"(0\.11\.2)"#{ version = "$1", git = "https://github.com/ijackson/rust-derive-builder", rev = "ba0c1a5311bd9f93ddf5f5b8ec2a5f6f03b22fbe" }#' crates/*/Cargo.toml
Note that the commitid has changed. This is because derive_builder is
in fact a workspace of 4 crates. 3 of them are of interest to arti
itself (the 4th exists only for testing). So the same "add git
revision" treatment had to be done to the `derive_builder` and
`derive_builder_macro` crates. Each dependency edge involves a new
commit in the derive_builder workspace, since we can't create a git
commit containing its own commitid. (We want to use commits, rather
than a branch, so that what we are depending on is actually properly
defined, and not subject to the whims of my personal github
namespace.)
There are no actual code changes in derive_builder.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
# Conflicts:
# crates/tor-config/Cargo.toml
# crates/tor-dirmgr/src/state.rs
# doc/semver_status.md
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Because the macro output is private, if we miss one out of the tests,
it doesn't fail due to dead code :-).
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Really, we probably don't want any of these not to be pub, but it
triggers "unreachable pub" in my test cases, and making it not pub by
mistake seems not very serious, and likely to be noticed.
Making the struct private in the test cases has the useful effect of
checking that all the methods are tested.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I don't think we need to bother with things in the prelude,
but doing it for serde and ConfigBuildError seems nice.
Noticed while writing a test case.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
And add an imprecation in define_list_config_builder's doc comment do
do so in future for other invocations of the macro.
Add add the missing full stops.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
As per
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/471#note_2798027
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Requested in
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/471#note_2798022
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
As per
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/471#note_2798026
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
As per
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/471#note_2798024
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
As per
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/471#note_2798020
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This will be useful especially for simple lists where the entry
doesn't need a separate builder type.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This replaces two almost-identical sets of structs and impls. More
are on the way, as per
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/issues/447
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is an automated change made with a perl one-liner and verified
with grep -L and grep -l.
Some warnings are introduced with this change; they will be removed
in subsequent commits.
See arti#208 for older discussion on this issue.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This change was made automatically with a perl one-liner, and
confirmed with `grep -L`.
The `rust-version` field itself was introduced in 1.56.0.
|
| |/
|
|
|
| |
There are no semantic changes here; only formatting. This is in
preparation for other changes (wrt MSRV and edition)
|
| |
|
|
| |
We are going to be using sub-field builders.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commitid is the current head of my MR branch
https://github.com/colin-kiegel/rust-derive-builder/pull/253
https://github.com/ijackson/rust-derive-builder/tree/field-builder
Using the commitid prevents surprises if that branch is updated.
We will require this newer version of derive_builder. The version
will need to be bumped again later, assuming the upstream MR is merged
and upstream do a release containing the needed changes.
We will need the new version of not only `derive_builder_core` (the
main macro implementation) but also`derive_builder` for a new error
type.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not all of these strictly need to be bumped to 0.2.0; many could go
to 0.1.1 instead. But since everything at the tor-rtcompat and
higher layers has had breaking API changes, it seems not so useful
to distinguish. (It seems unlikely that anybody at this stage is
depending on e.g. tor-protover but not arti-client.)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This has the different syntax for builder field attributes than what I
originally proposed in my MR, and which therefore is in the pinned
branch.
My upstream MR for the field attributes feature was morged:
https://github.com/colin-kiegel/rust-derive-builder/issues/239
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Drop config back-conversion from FooConfig to FooConfigBuilder
See merge request tpo/core/arti!391
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We are going to want to specify custom attributes on fields of the
builder struct. This feature was missing from derive_builder.
This commitid is the current head of my MR branch
https://github.com/colin-kiegel/rust-derive-builder/pull/237
https://github.com/ijackson/rust-derive-builder/tree/builder-field-attrs
Using the commitid prevents surprises if that branch is updated.
We will require this newer version of derive_builder. The version
will need to be bumped again later, assuming the upstream MR is merged
and upstream do a release containing the needed changes.
|
| |/ |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Tidy up many open-coded trait impls
See merge request tpo/core/arti!374
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
|
| |
Apropos discussion in
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/274
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Disable clippy::clone_on_ref_ptr
See merge request tpo/core/arti!352
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This lint is IMO inherently ill-conceived.
I have looked for the reasons why this might be thought to be a good
idea and there were basically two (and they are sort of contradictory):
I. "Calling ‘.clone()` on an Rc, Arc, or Weak can obscure the fact
that only the pointer is being cloned, not the underlying data."
This is the wording from
https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/v0.0.212/#clone_on_ref_ptr
It is a bit terse; we are left to infer why it is a bad idea to
obscure this fact. It seems to me that if it is bad to obscure some
fact, that must be because the fact is a hazard. But why would it be
a hazard to not copy the underlying data ?
In other languages, faliing to copy the underlying data is a serious
correctness hazard. There is a whose class of bugs where things were
not copied, and then mutated and/or reused in multiple places in ways
that were not what the programmer intended. In my experience, this is
a very common bug when writing Python and Javascript. I'm told it's
common in golang too.
But in Rust this bug is much much harder to write. The data inside an
Arc is immutable. To have this bug you'd have use interior mutability
- ie mess around with Mutex or RefCell. That provides a good barrier
to these kind of accidents.
II. "The reason for writing Rc::clone and Arc::clone [is] to make it
clear that only the pointer is being cloned, as opposed to the
underlying data. The former is always fast, while the latter can
be very expensive depending on what is being cloned."
This is the reasoning found here
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/2048
This is saying that *not* using Arc::clone is hazardous.
Specifically, that a deep clone is a performance hazard.
But for this argument, the lint is precisely backwards. It's linting
the "good" case and asking for it to be written in a more explicit
way; while the supposedly bad case can be written conveniently.
Also, many objects (in our codebase, and in all the libraries we use)
that are Clone are in fact simply handles. They contain Arc(s) (or
similar) and are cheap to clone. Indeed, that is the usual case.
It does not make sense to distinguish in the syntax we use to clone
such a handle, whether the handle is a transparent Arc, or an opaque
struct containing one or more other handles.
Forcing Arc::clone to be written as such makes for code churn when a
type is changed from Arc<Something> to Something: Clone, or vice
versa.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Closes #338.
|
| |
|
|
| |
This required a few new ErrorKinds.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Closes #246.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I found these versions empirically, by using the following process:
First, I used `cargo tree --depth 1 --kind all` to get a list of
every immediate dependency we had.
Then, I used `cargo upgrade --workspace package@version` to change
each dependency to the earliest version with which (in theory) the
current version is semver-compatible. IOW, if the current version
was 3.2.3, I picked "3". If the current version was 0.12.8, I
picked "0.12".
Then, I used `cargo +nightly upgrade -Z minimal-versions` to
downgrade Cargo.lock to the minimal listed version for each
dependency. (I had to override a few packages; see .gitlab-ci.yml
for details).
Finally, I repeatedly increased the version of each of our
dependencies until our code compiled and the tests passed. Here's
what I found that we need:
anyhow >= 1.0.5: Earlier versions break our hyper example.
async-broadcast >= 0.3.2: Earlier versions fail our tests.
async-compression 0.3.5: Earlier versions handled futures and tokio
differently.
async-trait >= 0.1.2: Earlier versions are too buggy to compile our
code.
clap 2.33.0: For Arg::default_value_os().
coarsetime >= 0.1.20: exposed as_ticks() function.
curve25519-dalek >= 3.2: For is_identity().
generic-array 0.14.3: Earlier versions don't implement
From<&[T; 32]>
httparse >= 1.2: Earlier versions didn't implement Error.
itertools at 0.10.1: For at_most_once.
rusqlite >= 0.26.3: for backward compatibility with older rustc.
serde 1.0.103: Older versions break our code.
serde_json >= 1.0.50: Since we need its Value type to implement Eq.
shellexpand >= 2.1: To avoid a broken dirs crate version.
tokio >= 1.4: For Handle::block_on().
tracing >= 0.1.18: Previously, tracing_core and tracing had separate
LevelFilter types.
typenum >= 1.12: Compatibility with rust-crypto crates
x25519-dalek >= 1.2.0: For was_contributory().
Closes #275.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't want MutCfg to be automatially coneable, or we'll wind up with
surprises like the one that this patch fixes in TorClient.
(The "surprise" is that reconfigure() would only apply its
client-specific options to one client instance.)
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This will help in the case when a configuration can only partially
change.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's useful to keep configuration objects inside a RwLock<Arc<>>, so we
can have slightly-stale pointers to the existing configuration structure
without holding locks too long.
This code adds a MutCfg type with basic support for this pattern,
and functions to make it a bit more ergonomic.
|