| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| ... | |
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Don't use SystemTime::now()
Closes #306
See merge request tpo/core/arti!365
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
but don't use it in a dyn Isolation context
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Expand documentation for isolation traits
See merge request tpo/core/arti!420
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
These aren't complete yet; I'm just making this commit to capture
the notes we took on a pad when we were discussing these APIs.
Part of #414.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Some error types indicate that the guard has failed as a dircache.
We should treat these errors as signs to close the circuit, and to
mark the guard as having failed.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
We already have the ability to get peer information from ChanMgr
errors, and therefore from any RetryErrors that contain ChanMgr
errors.
This commit adds optional peer information to tor-proto errors, and
a function to expose whatever peer information is available.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
It'll soon more convenient to pass in FallbackDirs as a slice of
references, rather than just a slice of FallbackDirs: I'm going to
be changing how we handle these in tor-dirmgr.
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If all guards are down and they won't be retriable for a while, try
waiting that long to get whichever guard _is_ retriable.
Additionally, if we are making multiple circuit plans in parallel,
only report our planning as having failed if we failed at making
_all_ the plans. Previously we treated any failure as fatal for the
other plans, which could lead to trouble in the case when guards
were all down or pending.
Part of #407.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Instead of requiring a `Box<dyn Isolation>`, it now takes either a
`Box<dyn Isolation>`, or an arbitrary `T` that implements
`Isolation`.
This API still allows the user to pass in a `Box<dyn Isolation>` if
that's what they have, but it doesn't require them to Box the
isolation on their own.
Part of #414.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
new api for isolation
See merge request tpo/core/arti!377
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
it seems I added conditional compilation without noticing it??
and there was some errors when choosing a prefered runtime depending on
feature flags
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
this also removes JoinResult
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
the inverted logic was too easy to mess up
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | | |
Absolish builders for CircMgrConfig and DirMgrConfig
See merge request tpo/core/arti!417
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
See commentary for the rationale.
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This has the different syntax for builder field attributes than what I
originally proposed in my MR, and which therefore is in the pinned
branch.
My upstream MR for the field attributes feature was morged:
https://github.com/colin-kiegel/rust-derive-builder/issues/239
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Replace all uses of our copy of this code.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This has the humantime_serde::option module, which we have upstreamed
and are about to switch to.
The remaining dependency with version = "1" is going to be removed
in a moment.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I used
git-grep -P '\#\[serde\((?!default|deny_unknown)'
to find places where I needed to add additional attributes on the
builder method fields.
This is currently a bit duplicative, but when #371 is completely done,
the validated (non-builder) configs won't need to be Deserialize any
more.
This is part of #371 and #372.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We are going to want to specify custom attributes on fields of the
builder struct. This feature was missing from derive_builder.
This commitid is the current head of my MR branch
https://github.com/colin-kiegel/rust-derive-builder/pull/237
https://github.com/ijackson/rust-derive-builder/tree/builder-field-attrs
Using the commitid prevents surprises if that branch is updated.
We will require this newer version of derive_builder. The version
will need to be bumped again later, assuming the upstream MR is merged
and upstream do a release containing the needed changes.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Replace many manual trait impls with use of educe
See merge request tpo/core/arti!375
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Code motion and the minimal mechanical changes.
As per
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/375#note_2783078
|
| | | | |
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When I wrote this, I arranged to skip dumping the field `pending`.
This must have been because I thought that either
(a) PendingEntry couldn't `#[derive(Debug)]` (but it can)
and/or
(b) Some of the fields of PendingEntry ought not to be dumped because
they might contain (eg) packet data. But I think they don't: there's
just the spec, and the Result which is (basically) a Circ.
I tried preseving something closer to the original using educe, but
educe gets somehow tangled up with the generics, and the result fails
to compile. I haven't investigated this further.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Disable clippy::clone_on_ref_ptr
See merge request tpo/core/arti!352
|
| | |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This lint is IMO inherently ill-conceived.
I have looked for the reasons why this might be thought to be a good
idea and there were basically two (and they are sort of contradictory):
I. "Calling ‘.clone()` on an Rc, Arc, or Weak can obscure the fact
that only the pointer is being cloned, not the underlying data."
This is the wording from
https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/v0.0.212/#clone_on_ref_ptr
It is a bit terse; we are left to infer why it is a bad idea to
obscure this fact. It seems to me that if it is bad to obscure some
fact, that must be because the fact is a hazard. But why would it be
a hazard to not copy the underlying data ?
In other languages, faliing to copy the underlying data is a serious
correctness hazard. There is a whose class of bugs where things were
not copied, and then mutated and/or reused in multiple places in ways
that were not what the programmer intended. In my experience, this is
a very common bug when writing Python and Javascript. I'm told it's
common in golang too.
But in Rust this bug is much much harder to write. The data inside an
Arc is immutable. To have this bug you'd have use interior mutability
- ie mess around with Mutex or RefCell. That provides a good barrier
to these kind of accidents.
II. "The reason for writing Rc::clone and Arc::clone [is] to make it
clear that only the pointer is being cloned, as opposed to the
underlying data. The former is always fast, while the latter can
be very expensive depending on what is being cloned."
This is the reasoning found here
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/2048
This is saying that *not* using Arc::clone is hazardous.
Specifically, that a deep clone is a performance hazard.
But for this argument, the lint is precisely backwards. It's linting
the "good" case and asking for it to be written in a more explicit
way; while the supposedly bad case can be written conveniently.
Also, many objects (in our codebase, and in all the libraries we use)
that are Clone are in fact simply handles. They contain Arc(s) (or
similar) and are cheap to clone. Indeed, that is the usual case.
It does not make sense to distinguish in the syntax we use to clone
such a handle, whether the handle is a transparent Arc, or an opaque
struct containing one or more other handles.
Forcing Arc::clone to be written as such makes for code churn when a
type is changed from Arc<Something> to Something: Clone, or vice
versa.
|