| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Also, document the features.
Closes #588.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Try to clarify more that the ChannelUsage is for describing the
usage for one particular channel request, not for the channel as a
whole. This is a potentially confusing point, so we should spell it
out completely.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
As suggested in
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/657#note_2827246
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Replace Channel::note_usage with Channel::engage_padding_activities,
which unconditionally causes the channel to (start to) do netflow
padding things.
The condition now lives in chanmgr.
Addresses
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/657#note_2826094
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This gets rid of many Result(). Many parameters are renamed.
Test cases of the now-impossible branch are removed.
Deleting the match from padding_parameters will come in a moment.
I've split off that commit since it has much whitespace noise.
for now, change the error type to Void.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Prompted by
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/657#note_2825962
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that the code that actually handles the netdir information can
cope with its lack, we can change the types of the various netdir
parameters and get rid of the foolish Bugs.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This commit is just the necessary plumbing. The config is currently
empty. We'll add something to it, for padding control, later.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Channel padding depends on what the channel is being used for. We
therefore need to let the channel code know this information.
The implementation of the per-channel padding control logic will be in
the new note_usage function, which for now is simply a stub.
A future commit will introduce a `PaddingControlState` which lives in
the channel frontend; consult the doc comment for that type to see why
the plumbing through the channel manager terminates in the channel
frontend.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The chanmgr remembers the last dormancy state it was told.
We invent a chanmgr-specific Dormancy which the arti-client code knows
how to convert from the richer top-level dormant status. This avoids
having to have everyone know all the variants of the top-level state.
To call reconfigure_general, we must also obtain and plumb through a
netdir. Right now we must return an internal error if there is in
fact no netdir, because reconfigure_general does not yet cope with a
missing netdir.
Nothing actually *uses* the dormancy yet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This function is going to become the code for controlling channels, in
general. (Including padding control.) Right now it doesn't do most
of the things.
In this commit:
* Change the prototype and the name now.
* Pass `()` for the dormancy and config, adding TODOs.
* Provide update_netdir method on AbstractChanMgr, and call that,
rather than having the ChanMgr go directly into the channel.
(That will enable us to test that `update_netdir` method
with test cases that don't have a complete ChanMgr.)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this change, each individual identity type becomes optional.
The functions that expose them unconditionally are now in a "legacy"
trait that only some downstream types are expected to implement.
There are new convenience APIs in HasRelayIds:
* to return Option<&keytype>,
* to see if one identity-set contains another.
This commit will break several downstream crates! For the
reviewer's convenience, I will put the fixes for those crates into a
series of squash! commits on this one.
tor-netdir
----------
Revise tor-netdir to accept optional identities. This required some
caveats and workarounds about the cases where we have to deal with a
key type that the tor-netdir code does not currently recognize at
all. If we start to add more identity types in the future, we may
well want more internal indices in this code.
tor-proto
---------
In order to make tor-proto support optional identities, there were
fewer changes than I thought. Some "check" functions needed to start
looking at "all the ids we want" rather than at "the two known IDs";
they also needed to accommodate that case where we don't have an ID
that we demand.
This change will also help with bridges, since we want to be able to
connect to a bridge without knowing all of its IDs up front.
The protocol currently _requires_ the two current ID types in some
places. To deal with that, I added a new `MissingId` error.
I also removed a couple of unconditional identity accessors for
chanmgr; code should use `target().identity(...)` instead.
tor-chanmgr
-----------
This is an incomplete conversion: it does not at all handle channel
targets without Ed25519 identities yet. It still uses those
identities to index its internal map from identity to channel; but
it gives a new `MissingId` error type if it's given a channel target
that doesn't have one.
We'll want to revise the map type again down the road when we
implement bridges, but I'd rather not step on the channel-padding
work in progress right now.
tor-guardmgr
------------
This change is mostly a matter of constructing owned identity types
more sensibly, rather than unwrapping them directly.
There are some places marked with TODOs where we still depend on
particular identity types, because of how the directory protocol
works. This will need revisiting when we add bridge support here.
tor-circmgr
-----------
These changes are just relatively simple API changes in the tests.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Now each type has a peer. In some cases this peer is just an
address, whereas in others (where key is relevant or address isn't
yet narrowed down) it's a full OwnedChanTarget.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Update all lint blocks
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
As per discussion in
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/586#note_2813573
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
From running add_warning, with manual picking of the right
hunks/lines.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This was the result of:
maint/add_warning crates/*/src/{lib,main}.rs
and then manually curating the results.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
We need this since we want to report certain conditions only when
they happen on a new channel, not if we observe them on a
preexisting channel.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fortunately, we don't need a separate type here: authenticated
clock skew can only come attached to a `tor_proto::Error`.
We also remove skew from `tor_proto::Error::HandshakeCertsExpired`,
since it would now be redundant.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The various background daemon tasks that `arti-client` used to spawn are
now handled inside their respective crates instead, with functions
provided to spawn them that return `TaskHandle`s.
This required introducing a new trait, `NetDirProvider`, which steals
some functionality from the `DirProvider` trait to enable `tor-circmgr`
to depend on it (`tor-circmgr` is a dependency of `tor-dirmgr`, so it
can't depend on `DirProvider` directly).
While we're at it, we also make some of the tasks wait for events from
the `NetDirProvider` instead of sleeping, slightly increasing
efficiency.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This lint is IMO inherently ill-conceived.
I have looked for the reasons why this might be thought to be a good
idea and there were basically two (and they are sort of contradictory):
I. "Calling ‘.clone()` on an Rc, Arc, or Weak can obscure the fact
that only the pointer is being cloned, not the underlying data."
This is the wording from
https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/v0.0.212/#clone_on_ref_ptr
It is a bit terse; we are left to infer why it is a bad idea to
obscure this fact. It seems to me that if it is bad to obscure some
fact, that must be because the fact is a hazard. But why would it be
a hazard to not copy the underlying data ?
In other languages, faliing to copy the underlying data is a serious
correctness hazard. There is a whose class of bugs where things were
not copied, and then mutated and/or reused in multiple places in ways
that were not what the programmer intended. In my experience, this is
a very common bug when writing Python and Javascript. I'm told it's
common in golang too.
But in Rust this bug is much much harder to write. The data inside an
Arc is immutable. To have this bug you'd have use interior mutability
- ie mess around with Mutex or RefCell. That provides a good barrier
to these kind of accidents.
II. "The reason for writing Rc::clone and Arc::clone [is] to make it
clear that only the pointer is being cloned, as opposed to the
underlying data. The former is always fast, while the latter can
be very expensive depending on what is being cloned."
This is the reasoning found here
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/2048
This is saying that *not* using Arc::clone is hazardous.
Specifically, that a deep clone is a performance hazard.
But for this argument, the lint is precisely backwards. It's linting
the "good" case and asking for it to be written in a more explicit
way; while the supposedly bad case can be written conveniently.
Also, many objects (in our codebase, and in all the libraries we use)
that are Clone are in fact simply handles. They contain Arc(s) (or
similar) and are cheap to clone. Indeed, that is the usual case.
It does not make sense to distinguish in the syntax we use to clone
such a handle, whether the handle is a transparent Arc, or an opaque
struct containing one or more other handles.
Forcing Arc::clone to be written as such makes for code churn when a
type is changed from Arc<Something> to Something: Clone, or vice
versa.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Closes #338.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The information is pretty basic here: we use "have we been able to
connect/TLS-handshake/Tor-handshake" as a proxy for "are we on the
internet? Are we on a reasonably unfiltered part of the internet?"
Eventually we'll want to make the information gathered and exported
more detailed: I've noted a few places in the code. For now,
however, this is about as good as C Tor does today, and it should be
a good starting point.
This uses a slightly different design from tor-dirmgr. Instead of
exporting an entire state structure via `postage::watch`, it exports
only the parts of that structure which the user is supposed to
read. I think that's more reasonable in this case because most of
the possible internal transitions in the tor-chanmgr state don't
cause a change in the exposed status.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The redundant method was a `to_owned` that probably shouldn't have
been called that. It was only used in one place.
The tests should get tor-linkspec's line coverage up above 90%.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|
|
This will cause some pain for now, but now is really the best time
to do this kind of thing.
|
