| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These were done with the following commands:
```
cargo set-version -p tor-basic-utils --bump patch
cargo set-version -p fs-mistrust --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-error --bump patch
cargo set-version -p tor-config --bump patch
cargo set-version -p tor-units --bump patch
cargo set-version -p tor-rtcompat --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-llcrypto --bump patch
cargo set-version -p tor-bytes --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-socksproto --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-cert --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-cell --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-proto --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-netdoc --bump patch
cargo set-version -p tor-netdir --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-persist --bump patch
cargo set-version -p tor-chanmgr --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-guardmgr --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-circmgr --bump patch
cargo set-version -p tor-dirclient --bump patch
cargo set-version -p tor-dirmgr --bump minor
cargo set-version -p arti-client --bump patch
cargo set-version -p arti --bump minor
cargo set-version -p arti-bench --bump minor
cargo set-version -p arti-testing --bump minor
```
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix clippy nightly again
See merge request tpo/core/arti!603
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Update all lint blocks
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
According to doc/Errors.md, and in keeping with current best
practices, we should not include display an error's `source()` as
part of that error's display method. Instead, we should let the
caller decide to call source() and display that error in turn.
Part of #323.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The "full" feature is a catch-all for all features, _except_:
* Those that select a particular implementation (like
tor-llcrypto/with-openssl) or build flag (like "static")
* Those that are experimental or unstable (like "experimental-api")
* Those that are testing-only.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This eliminates the possibility of writing the bug of failing to call
`should_be_exhausted`.
As per this discussion
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/572#note_2811464
Fixes #498
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This does away entirely with `wire_addr_len`, which recapitulates the
length calculation.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
return nodata instead of servfail in some instances
See merge request tpo/core/arti!564
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| |\ |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This only affects uses of thread_rng(), and affects them all more or
less indiscriminately. One test does not work with
ARTI_TEST_PRNG=deterministic; the next commit will fix it.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
After changes to the prop339, the domain name in an Address can only be
255 bytes max and can NOT contain nul byte(s).
Unit tests had to be modified to accept this change:
- Centralise msg_ip_address
- Add currently-passing tests for address length
- Test counted address length longer than type wants
Related to #463
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Related to #463
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Decoding and encoding of the DATAGRAM cell from proposal 339.
Related to #463.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Decoding and encoding implemented according to proposal 339.
Related to #463
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Decoding and encoding is implemented according to proposal 339
specifications.
Related to #463
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
From running add_warning, with manual picking of the right
hunks/lines.
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
| |
This was the result of:
maint/add_warning crates/*/src/{lib,main}.rs
and then manually curating the results.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Utilize cargo-sort: https://github.com/DevinR528/cargo-sort
Signed-off-by: Orhun Parmaksız <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit was made by reverting the previous commit, then
re-running the script I used to generate it. In theory there should
be no semantic changes: only changes due to improved formatting from
cargo edit.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I followed the following procedure to make these changes:
* I used maint/changed_crates to find out which crates had changed
since 0.3.0.
* I used grep and maint/list_crates to sort those crates in
topological (dependency) order.
* I looked through semver_status to find which crates were listed as
having semver-relevant changes (new APIs and breaking changes).
* I scanned through the git logs of the crates with no
semver-relevant changes listed to confirm that, indeed, they had
no changes. For those crates, I incremented their patch-level
version _without_ changing the version that other crates depend on.
* I scanned through the git logs of the crates with no
semver-relevant changes listed to confirm that, indeed, they had
no obvious breaking changes.
* I treated all crates that depend on `arti` and/or `arti-client` as
having breaking changes.
* I identified crates that depend on crates that have changed, even
if they have not changed themselves, and identified them as having
a non-breaking change.
* For all of the crates, I used `cargo set-version -p $CRATE --bump
$STATUS` (where `STATUS` is `patch` or `minor`) to update the
versions, and the depended-upon versions.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These crates had only clippy fixes that do not affect their
behavior:
tor-bytes
tor-cell
tor-events
tor-linkspec
tor-netdir
tor-socksproto
This crate only had the cargo-husky dependency removed, which
does not affect compatibility:
tor-llcrypto
Since these changes have no compatibility effects, it is not
necessary to bump the versions of these crates which other crates
depend on.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This does involve unwrap, but of course that can't fail unless the
formats fail, which would already panic (that's implied by format!).
|
| |
|
|
| |
* Except for safelog and fs-mistrust, which are new.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Remove all `use` statements for `TryFrom` and `TryInto`. These are
now redundant in Rust 2021.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is an automated change made with a perl one-liner and verified
with grep -L and grep -l.
Some warnings are introduced with this change; they will be removed
in subsequent commits.
See arti#208 for older discussion on this issue.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change was made automatically with a perl one-liner, and
confirmed with `grep -L`.
The `rust-version` field itself was introduced in 1.56.0.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
There are no semantic changes here; only formatting. This is in
preparation for other changes (wrt MSRV and edition)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not all of these strictly need to be bumped to 0.2.0; many could go
to 0.1.1 instead. But since everything at the tor-rtcompat and
higher layers has had breaking API changes, it seems not so useful
to distinguish. (It seems unlikely that anybody at this stage is
depending on e.g. tor-protover but not arti-client.)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NETINFO cells, which are sent in every handshake, may contain
timestamps. This patch adds an accessor for the timestamp in the
Netinfo messages, and teaches the tor-proto code how to compute the
minimum clock skew in the code.
The computation isn't terribly precise, but it doesn't need to be:
Tor should work fine if your clock is accurate to within a few
hours.
This patch also notes a Y2038 problem in the protocol: see
torspec#80.
Part of #405.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Replace many manual trait impls with use of educe
See merge request tpo/core/arti!375
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Code motion and the minimal mechanical changes.
As per
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/375#note_2783078
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Disable clippy::clone_on_ref_ptr
See merge request tpo/core/arti!352
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This lint is IMO inherently ill-conceived.
I have looked for the reasons why this might be thought to be a good
idea and there were basically two (and they are sort of contradictory):
I. "Calling ‘.clone()` on an Rc, Arc, or Weak can obscure the fact
that only the pointer is being cloned, not the underlying data."
This is the wording from
https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/v0.0.212/#clone_on_ref_ptr
It is a bit terse; we are left to infer why it is a bad idea to
obscure this fact. It seems to me that if it is bad to obscure some
fact, that must be because the fact is a hazard. But why would it be
a hazard to not copy the underlying data ?
In other languages, faliing to copy the underlying data is a serious
correctness hazard. There is a whose class of bugs where things were
not copied, and then mutated and/or reused in multiple places in ways
that were not what the programmer intended. In my experience, this is
a very common bug when writing Python and Javascript. I'm told it's
common in golang too.
But in Rust this bug is much much harder to write. The data inside an
Arc is immutable. To have this bug you'd have use interior mutability
- ie mess around with Mutex or RefCell. That provides a good barrier
to these kind of accidents.
II. "The reason for writing Rc::clone and Arc::clone [is] to make it
clear that only the pointer is being cloned, as opposed to the
underlying data. The former is always fast, while the latter can
be very expensive depending on what is being cloned."
This is the reasoning found here
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/2048
This is saying that *not* using Arc::clone is hazardous.
Specifically, that a deep clone is a performance hazard.
But for this argument, the lint is precisely backwards. It's linting
the "good" case and asking for it to be written in a more explicit
way; while the supposedly bad case can be written conveniently.
Also, many objects (in our codebase, and in all the libraries we use)
that are Clone are in fact simply handles. They contain Arc(s) (or
similar) and are cheap to clone. Indeed, that is the usual case.
It does not make sense to distinguish in the syntax we use to clone
such a handle, whether the handle is a transparent Arc, or an opaque
struct containing one or more other handles.
Forcing Arc::clone to be written as such makes for code churn when a
type is changed from Arc<Something> to Something: Clone, or vice
versa.
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
| |
Closes #360.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This exception is no longer necessary now that the underlying CI bug
is fixed.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Remove some needless refs and slicing
See merge request tpo/core/arti!327
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Prompted by nightly's clippy (which has some false positives, so is
currently disabled).
|
| |\|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Re-enable clippy::ptr_arg where it had been disabled.
See merge request tpo/core/arti!323
|