| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When calling copy_within, we want to copy the amount of data that
we're keeping; previously, we were copying an extra `action.drain`
bytes, which could have led to a panic.
Spotted by Opara.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Without this check, our socks code can enter an infinite loop
if a socket is closed at the wrong time.
Resolves TROVE-2024-011.
Fixes #1635.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
socks: Implement proposal 351.
See merge request tpo/core/arti!2401
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Introduce an enum, and use explicit `format_code @` syntax.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
(These streams would already be isolated by accident, since streams
with an RPC object are always on a client that's isolated from the
main client. But, as discussed on torspec!280, it's best to do this
sort of thing explicitly.)
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current best source here is prop351,
and later will be socks-extensions.md.
The examples are now correct.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
See https://spec.torproject.org/proposals/351-socks-auth-extensions.html
This proposal changes the interpretation of SOCKS5
usernames/passwords to give a more principled and extensible way of
getting RPC IDs and isolation strings.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
arti SOCKS proxy: Tear down connections when client sends optimistic data
See merge request tpo/core/arti!2443
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
We *do* want to support optimistic data, see
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/2436#note_3081886
However, right now, Arti risks mis-framing bugs if clients do send
optimistic data, which would be quite serious.
Mitigates #1627 / TROVE-2024-010 by replacing the misframing bug with
connection failure.
It doesn't seem so easy to write a test case for this.
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
(And similarly rename TcpListener to NetStreamListener,
along with their TcpStream/TcpListener associated types.)
These types are about to become generic over addresses,
and therefore shouldn't be named after TCP.
Renaming was done mostly with Rust Analyzer,
except for some macros that needed to be hand-edited.
(I'll revise the comments in the next commit;
this one is all about renaming.)
|
| |/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Ticket #1509 will probably get rid of this constant,
but for now we may as well put it in one place.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This belongs in a spec, but adding things to a spec is slow and
fraught. Instead we'll put it here for now and move it later.
There are some XXXXs about "finalizing" the design that we need to
resolve before we can merge !2373 and implement stream creation in
`arti-rpc-client-core`.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
(This is a bit trickier than I would like, but it ensures that we
never return a "not initialized yet" code.)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We'll need this for our rpc-library code to meaningfully open SOCKS
connections.
Closes #1523.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On its own, this might not seem like a huge improvement, but it will
later let us implement these RPC methods for types that can't
reasonably implement ClientConnectionTarget.
It also serves as a proof of concept that special-method invocation
can actually work, so that we can build things like this in cases
where introducing a trait isn't practical.
Closes #1427
|
| |
|
|
| |
The context will make it possible to invoke rpc methods.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The problem was that Rust won't let us say
```
type ConnTarget<R> = Arc<dyn ClientConnectionTarget>;
```
because the R parameter wasn't used.
Previously we solved this by using a macro instead of a type
definition, which is ugly.
I had been thinking previously I would need to declare some kind of
additional wrapper type, and had shrunk from the verbosity. But
@diziet pointed out that I could just use a 2-tuple unconditionally.
It's still not beautiful, but it is less hideous than before.
|
| |
|
|
| |
(This is a separate commit to make the branch more readable)
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(These will later become objects that can receive any application
request, once we have HTTP connect.)
For now, Session and TorClient implement this trait;
but soon there will be a new type to hold on to the created
DataStreamCtrl.
There are some XXXXs here, marking code that is too ugly to live.
I should fix it before I merge this branch.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I identified the cases to replace by searching for the string
`.report()`. There are a few that I didn't change:
* A couple of cases that used anyhow::Error,
* One case that reported two Errors.
* Two cases in `tor_hsclient::err` that just did
`error!("Bug: {}")`.
I have also not audited the cases in `tor-hsclient` where we're using
`tor_error::Report` manually.
Nonetheless, closes #949.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These have been subsumed by other errorkinds, mostly
OnionServiceProtocolViolation and TorProtocolViolation.
In particular please review the change in tor-hsclient closely;
I am not sure about the new errorkinds for the error there.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This takes an approach discussed in #736: Instead of trying to
distinguish INTRO/REND failures perfectly, we instead map our
existing ErrorKinds as best we can, in respect to the fact that
this distinction is not super important in practice.
Closes #736
|
| |
|
|
| |
Use this to emit HS_BAD_ADDRESS as appropriate.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
These errors are orthogonal to our actual error kinds. See
discussion on #736.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Part of #736
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't yet return all of them; this commit adds some todo notes
about changes we may need to our ErrorKinds.
Part of #736
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fixes `cargo check`
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The actual decoding here is just a placeholder. The important part
is that we can get either a (SessionId, StreamId) tuple out of the
request, or we treat it as part of an isolation token.
This commit has a few TODOs for additional things that we'll need
in order to build out our design.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
This enables some small simplifications.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
It will use this to find which TorClient to use when opening a
stream.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, there was a bug in the way that our code used our SOCKS
implementations. If the buffer used for a SOCKS handshake became full
without completing the handshake, then rather than expanding the buffer
or closing the connection, our code would keep trying to read into the
zero-byte slice available in the full buffer forever, in a tight loop.
We're classifying this as a LOW-severity issue, since it is only
exploitable by pluggable transports (which are trusted) and by
local applications with access to the SOCKS port.
Closes #861.
Fixes TROVE-2023-001.
Reported-By: Jakob Lell <jakob AT srlabs DOT de>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Retain "SocksHandshake" as a deprecated synonym.
Also, make an (on-by-default) feature for SocksProxyHandshake.
(There is about to be a SocksClientHandshake as well.)
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Also, note why we aren't hiding the addrs that we're listening on
here.
|