| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Apparently 1.68 now warns when you call into_iter() on something
that's already an iterator. Fair enough. Let's stop doing that.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This panics on error, and we're fine with a panic on misbehavior in
tests.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This warning kind of snuck up on us! (See #748) For now, let's
disable it. (I've cleaned it up in a couple of examples, since
those are meant to be more idiomatic and user-facing.)
Closes #748.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This is precisely the result of running the rune in
maint/adhoc-add-lint-blocks.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also replace Arg::takes_value with Arg::action to configure flags
that don't take parameters vs options that do.
This makes it easy to upgrade to clap 4.
Tested deprecations with:
cargo check --workspace --all-features --features clap/deprecated
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This removes the last cargo audit override (for the unmaintained
ansi_term).
Don't mark options as required when they have default values:
see <https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/pull/3793>.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As per
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/682#note_2830860
And subsequent IRC discussion.
Having done the work as per review comments, I don't much like the
result. It's quite un-ergonomiuc. If we can't have fs autodetection,
I think syntactic autodetection within sources.rs would be nearly as
nice.
However, I seem to be outvoted. At least the externally visible
functionality (of an arti binary, say) is reasonably ergonomic.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Update all lint blocks
|
| |
|
|
| |
The remaining consequences of running add_warning
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
From running add_warning, with manual picking of the right
hunks/lines.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This was the result of:
maint/add_warning crates/*/src/{lib,main}.rs
and then manually curating the results.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This gets rid of `#[serde(flatten)]` which prevents serde_ignored (and
other kinds of introspection) from working properly.
The price is now that the toplevel has to deal with two configuration
objects.
The Resolvable trait is overkill right now, but is going to do More
Things in a moment. In particular, we need the impl on tuples, so
that the whole config can be processed in one go.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This is an approximately minimal revision to get Builder in place;
subsequent commits will clean up the API.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Generally, change the paths that mention the crate name to go via a
module-level "use".
This involves adding tor-config as a direct dependency for a few
crates.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a benchmarking tool, and fs-mistrust doesn't like the
permissions in our CI. The env var ARTI_FS_DISABLE_PERMISSION_CHECKS
is (of course) specific to arti. Maybe it should be honoured here,
or this should be done via the config files.
But disabling this is fine for now.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This emphasises its nature. We're going to provide a more cooked
constructor in a moment.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Having a consistent order will make the nest commit easier to read.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Remove all `use` statements for `TryFrom` and `TryInto`. These are
now redundant in Rust 2021.
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Don't use SystemTime::now()
Closes #306
See merge request tpo/core/arti!365
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Code motion and import fixups.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Prompted by a compiler warning which I weirdly can't seem to reproduce?
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Instead of requiring a `Box<dyn Isolation>`, it now takes either a
`Box<dyn Isolation>`, or an arbitrary `T` that implements
`Isolation`.
This API still allows the user to pass in a `Box<dyn Isolation>` if
that's what they have, but it doesn't require them to Box the
isolation on their own.
Part of #414.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This makes heap profiling more viable.
Closes #391.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Previously we tried to do each connection in a run, and only then did we
start transferring data over them. Now we collect a bunch of the
futures that return an open stream, and run them all in parallel
with using them. This change includes connect-time in our
benchmarks, and allows us to test contention in our connect code.
Instead of using a Stream, I've changed the connection-generation
code to call a future-returning function directly, so we have a way
to explicitly pass which run we're in.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Disable clippy::clone_on_ref_ptr
See merge request tpo/core/arti!352
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This lint is IMO inherently ill-conceived.
I have looked for the reasons why this might be thought to be a good
idea and there were basically two (and they are sort of contradictory):
I. "Calling ‘.clone()` on an Rc, Arc, or Weak can obscure the fact
that only the pointer is being cloned, not the underlying data."
This is the wording from
https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/v0.0.212/#clone_on_ref_ptr
It is a bit terse; we are left to infer why it is a bad idea to
obscure this fact. It seems to me that if it is bad to obscure some
fact, that must be because the fact is a hazard. But why would it be
a hazard to not copy the underlying data ?
In other languages, faliing to copy the underlying data is a serious
correctness hazard. There is a whose class of bugs where things were
not copied, and then mutated and/or reused in multiple places in ways
that were not what the programmer intended. In my experience, this is
a very common bug when writing Python and Javascript. I'm told it's
common in golang too.
But in Rust this bug is much much harder to write. The data inside an
Arc is immutable. To have this bug you'd have use interior mutability
- ie mess around with Mutex or RefCell. That provides a good barrier
to these kind of accidents.
II. "The reason for writing Rc::clone and Arc::clone [is] to make it
clear that only the pointer is being cloned, as opposed to the
underlying data. The former is always fast, while the latter can
be very expensive depending on what is being cloned."
This is the reasoning found here
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/2048
This is saying that *not* using Arc::clone is hazardous.
Specifically, that a deep clone is a performance hazard.
But for this argument, the lint is precisely backwards. It's linting
the "good" case and asking for it to be written in a more explicit
way; while the supposedly bad case can be written conveniently.
Also, many objects (in our codebase, and in all the libraries we use)
that are Clone are in fact simply handles. They contain Arc(s) (or
similar) and are cheap to clone. Indeed, that is the usual case.
It does not make sense to distinguish in the syntax we use to clone
such a handle, whether the handle is a transparent Arc, or an opaque
struct containing one or more other handles.
Forcing Arc::clone to be written as such makes for code churn when a
type is changed from Arc<Something> to Something: Clone, or vice
versa.
|
| | |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This makes using the `PreferredRuntime` the first-class option inside
`arti-client`, freeing users who don't want to think about runtimes from
having to do so.
`TorClient::create_unbootstrapped` and `builder` now automatically
use this runtime, leaving only `builder_custom` for users who wish to
manually specify a runtime.
This lets us clean up the docs a lot: mentions of using custom runtimes
are now relegated to nearer the end of the crate-level documentation,
and we mostly just link to `tor_rtcompat`'s docs to explain more there.
Instead, we take some more time to explain how you use the builder API
to create clients synchronously.
Other doc cleanups included getting rid of the explanation of `TorAddr`
in the main crate-level doc; this is already well-documented elsewhere,
and is something users should discover organically later.
fixes arti#326
|
| |/ |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Closes #338.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit changes how the `TorClient` type works, enabling it to be
constructed synchronously without initiating the bootstrapping process.
Daemon tasks are still started on construction (although some of them
won't do anything if the client isn't bootstrapped).
The old bootstrap() methods are now reimplemented in terms of the new
create_unbootstrapped() and bootstrap_existing() methods.
This required refactoring how the `DirMgr` works to enable the same sort
of thing there.
closes #293
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Preparatory work for auto config reload
See merge request tpo/core/arti!284
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is by no means our final API, but should represent an
improvement. Here instead of having to specify a list of files and
their is-this-optional status, along with a list of command-line
options, we have a single structure that encapsulates all of that
information.
Two advantages here:
- Callers no longer have to remember what the boolean means.
- We can "reload" more easily, by keeping the source object around.
This change also implements the correct behavior for our default
configuration file in `arti::main`: if the file is absent and the
user doesn't list a config file, that's no problem. But if the user
lists _that very same config file, we should insist that it be
present.
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This implements the proposal from arti#298, making the
`BenchmarkResults` type be made out of a bunch of new `Statistic` types
(which summarize the mean, median, range, and standard deviation of an
arbitrary value) instead of overloading `TimingSummary` for this
purpose.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This should help avoid some amount of temptation towards API
proliferation.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We now conduct benchmark tests with multiple concurrent streams (by
default; this is configurable by passing `-p` to `arti-bench`).
Currently, these results just get "flattened" for the purposes of
statistical analysis (as in, results_raw contains the results of each
connection's timing summary, across all benchmark runs). This might be
something we wish to change in future.
The stats summary now also records "best" and "worst" values for each
metric, to give a rough idea of the range of values encountered.
Additionally, we now support writing the benchmark results out to a JSON
file. A future commit may integrate this with CI, so that we have
benchmark results for every commit as a build artefact.
(some documentation was also fixed)
part of arti#292
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We now do multiple samples (configurable; default 3) per type of
`arti-bench` benchmark run, and take a mean and median average of all
data collected, in order to hopefully be a bit more resilient to random
outliers / variation.
This uses some `futures::stream::Stream` hacks, which might result in
more connections being made than required (and might impact the TTFB
metrics somewhat, at least for downloading).
Results now get collected into a `BenchmarkResults` struct per type of
benchmark, which will be in turn placed into a `BenchmarkSummary` in a
later commit; this will also add the ability to serialize the latter
struct out to disk, for future reference.
part of arti#292
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\ |
|
