| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| ... | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| |/ / / / / / |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
relay: Implement a first relay background task
See merge request tpo/core/arti!3363
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
We have bootstrap() to prepare everything we need before starting the
relay which yields a TorRelay.
This commit then adds a run() function which starts the relay by
launching background task. At the moment, we only have one task and it
is the channel expiry one.
The relay blocks on the task handle set until one task is on error or
stops which leads to shutting down the relay.
Part of #2217
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This is a background task in charge of expiring closing channels and
future work is to also prune duplicate channels.
This is not used nor called at this commit, next commit will add the
task handling.
Part of #2217
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
tor-netdoc: parse2: Minor fixes
See merge request tpo/core/arti!3376
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Since 9ce85acb3ab0d1a0b1be6ef0f10707983f4362a3
tor-netdoc: replace impl_item_argument_as_display with NormalItemArgument
this trait impl has implications for encoding as well as parsing.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
In principle some other trait might be in scope.
|
| | | |_|/ / /
| |/| | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
subdoc intro items aren't inherently incoherent, but implementing them
is nontrivial. Let's reject them with a bespoke error instead.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Bump MSRV from 1.85.1 to 1.86
See merge request tpo/core/arti!3382
|
| | |/ / / / / |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
tor-netdoc: blanket impl parse2 traits for Arc
See merge request tpo/core/arti!3381
|
| | |/ / / / /
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This replaces one ad-hoc impl and will avoid having to have any more.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|/ / / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
proto: Add the initial implementation of the relay reactor(s)
See merge request tpo/core/arti!3369
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
The `RelayReactor` now holds the sending end of the shutdown broadcast
channel, so if `RelayReactor` exits, both the forward and the backward
relay reactor will notice and shut down too.
Similarly, if the forward or backward reactor exits, the `RelayReactor`
will notice (because it select!s between the two), and will shut down
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
I used `futures::join` by mistake: the intention here is to have
`RelayReactor` exit when either one of the fwd/bwd reactors exits.
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This also clarifies why we reroute cells to `BackwardReactor`.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Things will get very confusing if every reactor uses different variable
names for this, so I am renaming it back to input.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
The channel provider is used to request outgoing channels from the
`ChanMgr` in response to `EXTEND`/`EXTEND2` cells, so it belongs in the
`ForwardReactor`.
(This was leftover from the old circ reactor architecture)
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This is the first step towards parallelizing stream reads and
writes.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This makes it a bit clearer that `cell_rx` is for moving stream data
between `ForwardReactor` and `BackwardReactor`.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
The forward/backward terminology is clearer.
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
BackwardReactor is not meant to be used directly (the channel reactor is
supposed to use the `RelayReactor` wrapper instead).
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
`BackwardReactor` now exists alongside `ForwardReactor`,
to make it clearer that they are siblings.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
We are about to need this, because BackwardReactor will be moved to
another module, and we want to keep its internals private.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This is no longer used, and not having it makes the code less generic
and easier to read, so I'm removing it for now.
If we ever need it again, we can add it back.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This is the first step towards making `ForwardReactor` and
`BackwardReactor` be siblings (rather than being in a
primary-subordinate relationship).
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This sketches out the "dual" relay reactor implementation, which has:
* a `ForwardReactor`, which forwards cells from the client to the exit
* a `BackwardReactor`, which deals with streams, control messages, and
forwarding cells from the exit to the client
The `BackwardReactor` is actually the "primary" reactor. It's the
interface we expose to the channel reactor (via the `RelayReactor`
type-alias), and it is in charge of spawning the "secondary"
`ForwardReactor` task (via its `run()` function).
See the module-level docs from `tor_proto::relay::reactor` for more
details on the inner workings of the two reactors.
This commit also adds the incomplete skeleton of the circuit extension
logic. Once #1599 is implemented, we'll be able to uncomment the
commented code, or replace it, depending on what the corresponding
channel reactor APIs look like.
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
We only have one command right now (`Shutdown`), so this is mostly just
boilerplate.
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
We will need a handle to the runtime to spawn the "secondary" reactor
from the main one.
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
There will soon be multiple systems that need to be notified of reactor
shut down, so it's time to change this to a channel type with a
cloneable receiver.
|
| | | | | | | |
|