mirrors/arti.git/doc/dev/notes, branch arti-v1.2.7

Fix typos

2024-09-03T08:09:02Z

Merge branch 'torclient-doc' into 'main'

2024-08-15T10:38:00Z

doc/dev/notes: keymgr-porcelain: Add note about moving keymgr functions out of TorClient. See merge request tpo/core/arti!2314

doc/dev/notes: keymgr-porcelain: Add note about alternative API.

2024-08-14T11:45:38Z

dov/dev/notes: Add note about live reloads in restricted discovery mode.

2024-08-12T12:04:31Z

This describes a couple of options for extending the config reloading logic to support watching for changes in the `restricted_disovery.key_dirs` directories. Note: the options we have here are, in a sense, two extremes * one is about refactoring some of the existing code into a reusable component, and leaving most of the configuration logic unchanged * the other involves rethinking the entire config watching/reloading mechanism to support watching for changes in arbitrary directories I am leaning towards the simpler option, because I'm not sure the other one is worth the added complexity (we currently only have a single use case for it).

doc/dev/notes: keymgr-porcelain: Add note about moving keymgr functions out of TorClient.

2024-08-06T10:53:46Z

This would a possible long-term fix for #1496.

rpc: Remove RpcError data field and use Report

2024-07-25T12:46:29Z

Per discussion, this field isn't really specified in a way that lets us fill it sensibly at the moment. So for now, we're going to just omit it. Additionally, we said that we'd Report on our errors; this branch changes the implementation of RpcError to do that. Question: Will the blanket implementation for Into make it harder to re-add a Data field later on if we want to do so?

rpc: split "method not found"

2024-07-25T12:43:30Z

We've wanted separate error codes for "no such method exists" and "this method exists, but this object doesn't have it."

Tests and documentation about NULs in the RPC stream.

2024-07-16T13:51:27Z

doc/dev/notes: vanguards: Make client rend circuits be STUB+.

2024-06-25T16:30:16Z

According to the [vanguards spec], client rendezvous circuits should be STUB+: * lite: `C -> G -> L2 -> Rend` * full: `C -> G -> L2 -> L3 -> Rend` [vanguards spec]: https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/torspec/-/blob/e5ace3667dcbbf893c6b632fd4e3f16114fd2a0e/spec/vanguards-spec/index.md

relay-sketch: Add a link to 1454.

2024-05-30T15:33:05Z