mirrors/arti.git/crates/tor-dirmgr, branch arti-v0.1.0 mirror of https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti http://git.dilluti0n.com/mirrors/arti.git/atom?h=arti-v0.1.0 2022-03-01T13:59:34Z Bump all crates to 0.1.0 2022-03-01T13:59:34Z Nick Mathewson nickm@torproject.org 2022-03-01T13:59:34Z urn:sha1:e8e9791a9757a32779657c5284b380ae91ca7979 dirmgr::Store.expire_all takes config 2022-02-23T18:56:52Z tharvik tharvik@users.noreply.github.com 2022-02-11T12:02:35Z urn:sha1:b28803d861030c56b8d77deacbfc9fd29746bb27 dirmgr: add Store trait 2022-02-23T18:50:33Z tharvik tharvik@users.noreply.github.com 2022-02-03T15:35:40Z urn:sha1:8658052ce3c4c65fb8cfdc41dab5ead681dc3e9f Rename TorConnectionFailed to TorAccessFailed 2022-02-22T20:38:13Z Nick Mathewson nickm@torproject.org 2022-02-22T20:38:13Z urn:sha1:7d4a57d5fa1a500f074835ecb0d8b204bc99d012 Rename TorShuttingDown to ArtiShuttingDown 2022-02-22T20:36:09Z Nick Mathewson nickm@torproject.org 2022-02-22T20:36:09Z urn:sha1:0e242831b2520f7b2d205daa24ba7740740672af dirclient: Remove HttpStatus error variant 2022-02-17T20:12:00Z Nick Mathewson nickm@torproject.org 2022-02-17T20:12:00Z urn:sha1:64a0d4dce54199c2c3752d48e91a5118bb898b91 Getting a non-200 status is no longer a failure condition; it's just a different kind of answer. Closes #349. Merge branch 'remaining-errors' 2022-02-17T19:22:47Z Nick Mathewson nickm@torproject.org 2022-02-17T19:22:47Z urn:sha1:83d001d66179e63978be632de0e15277f17a8228 Use TorConnectionFailed for failure to download directory. 2022-02-17T17:37:07Z Nick Mathewson nickm@torproject.org 2022-02-17T17:37:07Z urn:sha1:a5e4e24537a022c8e84062b05fe4bf9bb8f879f4 tor-dirmgr: Use Bug type for sqlite-detected bugs 2022-02-17T13:32:47Z Ian Jackson ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk 2022-02-17T13:22:01Z urn:sha1:c9aa3b99379a9e1458610185fb8a5346f76a9e5a So we get a stack trace tor-dirmgr: Make sqlite_error_kind take rusqlite::Error 2022-02-17T13:31:36Z Ian Jackson ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk 2022-02-17T13:21:07Z urn:sha1:1a9a209771008dac048e3eda14d039e89045dbe3 We're about to reuse this and we'll want it to take the higher-level type. Also it seems more proper like this.